Bucket load

[ryanmelt]

closes #669

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 21.42% and project coverage change: -0.12 ⚠️

Comparison is base (761b0b7) 71.01% compared to head (7ab34cb) 70.89%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #680      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.01%   70.89%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         469      470       +1     
  Lines       30004    30075      +71     
  Branches      816      816              
==========================================
+ Hits        21308    21323      +15     
- Misses       8611     8669      +58     
+ Partials       85       83       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
frontend	58.61% <ø> (+0.19%)	⬆️
ruby-api	51.36% <25.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
ruby-backend	78.09% <20.00%> (-0.31%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
openc3/lib/openc3/utilities/bucket_utilities.rb	80.95% <20.00%> (-6.42%)	⬇️
...mos-script-runner-api/app/models/running_script.rb	18.96% <25.00%> (-0.80%)	⬇️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[jmthomas]

Besides the change around in files what has actually changed here?

[ryanmelt]

You can do require 'openc3/utilities/bucket_require' and then require 'TARGET_NAME/procedures/whatever.rb' now

[jmthomas]

You can do require 'openc3/utilities/bucket_require' and then require 'TARGET_NAME/procedures/whatever.rb' now

Any reason that shouldn't "just work" without the require?

[ryanmelt]

Because I don't like always monkey patching a core ruby feature like require