Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

When adding a software, on-the-fly creation should only propose software #5298

Closed
SamuelHassine opened this issue Dec 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

When adding a software, on-the-fly creation should only propose software #5298

SamuelHassine opened this issue Dec 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
bug use for describing something not working as expected solved use to identify issue that has been solved (must be linked to the solving PR)

Comments

@SamuelHassine
Copy link
Member

Description

  1. Go to a vulnerability
  2. Click on the "+" button in affected softwares
  3. Click on the "+" button to create a software

=> You have the choice to create any type of observable

Expected result: this should go directly to the software creation form.
@SamuelHassine SamuelHassine added bug use for describing something not working as expected needs triage use to identify issue needing triage from Filigran Product team labels Dec 23, 2023
SamuelHassine added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 24, 2023
@SamuelHassine
[frontend] Fix reset type when closing in observable creation (#5298)
4ca8989
@SamuelHassine SamuelHassine added solved use to identify issue that has been solved (must be linked to the solving PR) and removed needs triage use to identify issue needing triage from Filigran Product team labels Dec 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug use for describing something not working as expected solved use to identify issue that has been solved (must be linked to the solving PR)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@SamuelHassine