Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RiskProfiler Review by Carol Wagner (Oct 18, 2022) #92

Open
16 of 28 tasks
anthonyfok opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
16 of 28 tasks

RiskProfiler Review by Carol Wagner (Oct 18, 2022) #92

anthonyfok opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Question

Comments

@anthonyfok
Copy link
Member

anthonyfok commented Oct 19, 2022

@CarolLWagner provided the following very helpful review of RIskProfiler v1.0 build 1017 "Release Candidate 1" to @JulieVdV via an MS Word document RiskProfilerEdits_Oct18_2022.docx. (Many thanks, @CarolLWagner!)

The Word document has been converted into the following TODO list to help tracking. While most points can be fixed with text editing from WordPress, Some points may involve code change or further discussion. We might need to open extra issues when/where necessary.


Popup information/disclaimer and on Review the Disclaimer page

  • “Results should not be used for building- or property-specific applications ...” (add hyphen)
  • “Estimates are provided for the effect of shaking damage to buildings and inhabitants; damage from secondary hazards (aftershocks, tsunami, landslide, ...” (change colon to semi-colon although I would suggest making it another sentence!)
  • “RiskProfiler provides a visual representation of values which are rounded as appropriate.” (remove comma)
  • “See the discussion of uncertainties and intended use here.” (no hyperlink on word “here”)

Main page

  • While scrolling down the page the text scrolls up and shows behind the header bar. Text behind text looks confusing and messy. Can this be changed? #93
  • Non-important suggestion: “For each scenario you can learn about: The extent and level of ground shaking” Just wondering if “level” is the best word here. Maybe “amount” or “intensity” or “strength”?
  • Learn More section: Why have left/right arrow AND dots? Why have arrows continue to cycle through the topics? Can left arrow stop on first subject and right arrow stop on last/7th dot/subject?
  • Learn More section, Read Frequently Asked Questions “Understand the data through ‘FAQ’” (remove s; it is inherent in the Q; also not sure you need quotes around FAQ)
    • also remove s on FAQ on Uncertainties and Intended Use page, 3rd paragraph
    • also remove s on FAQ on Home/Learn More/Earthquake Scenario Information page
    • also remove s on FAQ on Home/Learn More/Introduction to Earthquakes and Risk page

Explore Earthquake scenarios

  • “Tour this page” popup explanations “... click on map and using scale bar on bottom of the map” don’t see a scale bar
  • Zoom into maximum and colour disappears – missing smaller hexagons? I see change is hexagon size for Cascadia scenario but not for other scenarios
  • PGA maps legend title says “in units of g” but popup values are %g (I commented on this in July)
  • Download of pdf or png results graph: there is no title/text indicating scenario

Probabilistic Earthquake Risk

  • Suggestion for non-important change? List cities alphabetically or geographically West to East
  • Popup on maps ... “1 or less” should be “1 or fewer”
  • When on Probabilistic map page viewing a city map, the browser back button goes to whatever main page I was on previously not back to Probabilistic Risk selection page
  • Why have red X on top right of Probabilistic page?

Home /Learn More / General Information

  • About Earthquake Scenario -> “Explore earthquake scenarios” box leads to Error page

Home/LearnMore/Introduction to Earthquakes and Risk

  • “Many Indigenous peoples’ oral traditions and histories ...” change people’s to peoples’

Home/LearnMore/Earthquake Scenario Information

  • Text on map looks squashed left/right
  • “What earthquake scenario information is available on RiskProfiler, and how does it help?” (remove comma)

Home/Download Data/Downloads

  • Earthquake Scenario Data “More information about earthquake scenario risk concepts can be found here” (link doesn’t work)
  • Probabilistic Earthquake Risk Data – first 2 links do not work
  • Other downloads
    • Probabilistic Earthquake Risk Assessment Data Dictionary: the “here” is not hyperlinked
    • Earthquake scenario Risk Assessment Data Dictionary: “... datasets can be download**ed** here.”

Carol Wagner
Oct 18, 2022

@anthonyfok anthonyfok added Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Question labels Oct 19, 2022
@anthonyfok anthonyfok added this to Backlog in RiskProfiler via automation Oct 19, 2022
@anthonyfok anthonyfok moved this from Backlog to In progress in RiskProfiler Oct 19, 2022
anthonyfok added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2022
@drotheram
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @anthonyfok for converting this into an issue

anthonyfok added a commit to OpenDRR/h7-riskprofiler that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2022
Extracted from Google Docs "V3_Risk-Intro_Scenario_Prob_Text"
shared with me by @JulieVdV

Fixes "Text on map looks squashed left/right" noticed by @CarolLWagner
in OpenDRR/riskprofiler#92
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Question
Projects
RiskProfiler
In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants