Create code-of-conduct.md #3
Conversation
This was using a sample of well known organizations that we will likely interact with. It appears many are using similar language, which is not surprising. Following my own experience and the advice of Metagov, this and other governance documents will attempt to define the least amount of rules and process until necessary to do so. # Researched OSS communities codes of conduct - CNCF: Good start on how to set broad rules to allow teams to self organize - Gitcoin: very similar to CNCF with some good changes - ENS: similar language to others. A bit too much detail that makes it harder to follow. - Discord: a few service abuse references that were included - Openstack (OpenInfra): very focused on conflicts of interest. We do not have enough commercial contribution to be worried about this yet. - Giveth: very similar to the text already used
sarob
requested review from
zengatsu,
epowell101,
baokiddy,
stefi-says,
SpaceTristan,
Razga,
G-r-ay and
poupou-web3
|
working towards #2 and OpenDataforWeb3/Resources#137 |
| * Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or email address, without their explicit permission | ||
| * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting | ||
| * Sending unsolicited bulk messages (or spam) to others | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
of course this is examples but, should we include something about 'using ODC to promote one person own work without ODC consent?'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure how to do that but I’m open to suggestions. OpenStack CoC has a lot of language on conflicts of interest. Maybe that has something similar to what you are thinking?
| * Sending unsolicited bulk messages (or spam) to others | ||
|
|
||
| Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
felt that maybe here we have a sharp turn . Are we talking about "odc jedis" as projects maintainers? I got confused if thats the case or we are talking of future Sandbox project leads .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I should change that to project lead or sandbox team lead.
Thanks! |
|
This conversation has been moved discourse. When we complete the discussion, changes will be pushed to this PR. |
This was using a sample of well known organizations that we will likely interact with. It appears many are using similar language, which is not surprising. Following my own experience and the advice of Metagov, this and other governance documents will attempt to define the least amount of rules and process until necessary to do so.
Researched OSS communities codes of conduct