Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

projects/imx6: final merge of all changes #3645

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

projects/imx6: final merge of all changes #3645

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vpeter4
Copy link
Contributor

@vpeter4 vpeter4 commented Nov 26, 2014

tested on TBS Matrix v2.1 and CuBox-i4Pro

label = "imx6:red:front";
max-brightness = <248>;
pwms = <&pwm1 0 50000>;
+ linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

be careful here, that only initialises default-trigger

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you mean by that? Any problem I can have with this?
Default trigger is heartbeat so as soon kernel starts led starts blinking. Later from service it is set to default-on.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First I think I have mixed that with c code :-)

in C:

int x, y = 5;

will only initialze y to 5, so afterwards calculating with x yields undefinied behaviour. Not sure what dtsi is though.

Edit: Oh, I see it's "linux,default-trigger" <- the complete thing is a var: http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~baker/devices/lxr/http/source/linux/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/gpio/led.txt

@jenkins101
Copy link
Contributor

very good @vpeter4!

@vpeter4
Copy link
Contributor Author

vpeter4 commented Feb 2, 2015

No more interest for imx6 and openelec? I mean other systems beside cubox-i.
TBS Matrix working, Udoo working, Wandboard also working.

@jpulz
Copy link

jpulz commented Feb 2, 2015

+1 for Wandboard (Quad Rev. B1 in my case)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 3, 2015

Wandboard support is not integrated to this pull request.
What is the best ?

  • merge this and made a second pull request for the Wandboard (and Udoo)
  • or create a new pull request with the support for all the additional imx6 support.

@vpeter4
Copy link
Contributor Author

vpeter4 commented Feb 3, 2015

I don't have Wandboard so I would prefer second PR for it.

@jenkins101
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 6, 2015

I wait for integration of this, and after I would do a Pull request for Wandboard management.

Thank you.
PS: Lakka project wait this to resurrect their Wandboard version.

@piotrasd
Copy link
Contributor

piotrasd commented Feb 6, 2015

+1

@vpeter4
Copy link
Contributor Author

vpeter4 commented Feb 10, 2015

So I see OpenELEC 5.0.2 and still no sign of merging this PR. And I though this will be done after 5.0.0.

@sraue: is there any interest of OpenELEC to support more devices based on i.MX6 SoC or not?
If yes then do it and if not then tell us so we can move on and stop waiting for official landing (like ignoring all other devices because I see no point of supporting them manually which I have no interest).

@piotrasd
Copy link
Contributor

@vpeter4 could you rebase ? Thanks

@vpeter4
Copy link
Contributor Author

vpeter4 commented Feb 13, 2015

@piotrasd: why waste time if not merged anyway. So I should rebase again and again every few days....
When it will be clear that merge will happen then I will rebase.

@vpeter4
Copy link
Contributor Author

vpeter4 commented Feb 14, 2015

I'm giving up on this so closing PR. To bad.

@CvH
Copy link
Contributor

CvH commented Feb 14, 2015

At least a short statement from @sraue should be doable :-(

@JoostK
Copy link

JoostK commented Mar 1, 2015

Please merge this so OpenELEC may benefit from the additionally support devices. @vpeter4 has done some awesome work here, I have been running his UDOO build for several months already without issues.

@fritsch
Copy link
Contributor

fritsch commented Mar 2, 2015

@sraue A statement is needed if you want to have that integrated or not. Shipping and providing another 4 images is a completely different topic and from my POV unlikely to happen.

@sebguilbaud
Copy link

what to you mean by the "statement" term ? (french spoken here)
@vpeter4's work should not remained unused, it is not clean enough to be merged ?

@vpeter4
Copy link
Contributor Author

vpeter4 commented Apr 10, 2015

@xoddark took over my work here: https://github.com/xoddark/OpenELEC.tv/commits/imx6_multi_devices
I will help him as much I can. Hope his work will not decay as mine. Seems official OpenELEC cares only for official partners and sponsors.

@RadiatorTwo
Copy link

I want to make OpenELEC run on the RIoTBoard.
I managed to compile and boot the version from @xoddark.
I used the mainline u-boot and dtb from mainline Kernel though. Boots up without problems and can get a picture in u-boot over HDMI.
But I can´t get a picture on when OpenELEC starts.

I´d like to integrate the needed code, but I´m no kernel/driver programmer and would need some help on what I have to change to make it run.
Only need the Info in what places I have to make changes.

@vpeter4
Copy link
Contributor Author

vpeter4 commented May 3, 2015

You need to use appropriate dtb for kernel 3.14 which is used for imx6 project - in general you can't mix dtb's between different kernel versions. So you have 2 options: use mainline kernel or port required changes to kernel used by openelec.

@RadiatorTwo
Copy link

Ok then I´ll stick to the mainline kernel since all changes are in there.
Will only have to look on how to boot up the rootfs.
Thanks for the reply.

@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request May 13, 2015
@ElreboCM
Copy link

@RadiatorTwo Are you sure that the mainline kernel supports vpu and gpu?

@s00500
Copy link

s00500 commented May 13, 2015

Please merge this! @vpeter4's work is really cool and running Openelec on the i.mx6 is a really nice thing! I can't understand why this request hasn't been accepted yet

@vpeter4 vpeter4 closed this May 20, 2015
@vpeter4 vpeter4 deleted the imx6-final branch May 20, 2015 09:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet