Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some errors about the addition of dampers to 15MW monopile wind turbines #2220

Open
3sdb opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 9 comments
Open

Some errors about the addition of dampers to 15MW monopile wind turbines #2220

3sdb opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 9 comments

Comments

@3sdb
Copy link

3sdb commented May 16, 2024

I am getting the following error during the simulation, can you give me some suggestions?
b1f043b855e02f7bd08f8846fa5edba

@jjonkman
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @3sdb ,

A similar set of error messages was reported in the following issue where the problem was incorrect initialization of the rotor speed: #1718.

Best regards,

@3sdb
Copy link
Author

3sdb commented May 17, 2024

Dear:
I've changed the rotor velocity, as you prompted, but I've got some other errors in the analog (gendof is turned off)
bfb662ad0e712786fb054fe7e0f4bc0

@jjonkman
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @3sdb,

It appears your model is numerically unstable, but it is not clear to me why. With GenDOF = FALSE, the ROSCO controller will have no effect on the response, even when enabled.

What else have you changed in the IEA Wind 15-MW baseline wind turbine atop monopile model relative to the original OpenFAST model provided in its repository: https://github.com/IEAWindTask37/IEA-15-240-RWT/tree/master/OpenFAST/IEA-15-240-RWT-Monopile?

Best regards,

@3sdb
Copy link
Author

3sdb commented May 18, 2024

Dear @jjonkman
I tried to revert it back to the original model, but I just added the damping file to the servo file, but something happened during the simulation, and I was a bit helpless
a3044731735ac1563cf7c8b6bc42792
533b284bddf4bc3c9d113a006509f08
IEA-15-240-RWT-Monopile_TMDInput.txt

@jjonkman
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @3sdb,

Are you saying that your simulation runs as expected except when you add a nacelle-based TMD that causes your model to go unstable?

In our Structural Controller (StC) input file, I see that StC_P_Z is likely specified incorrectly because for a nacelle-based TMD, this input should be specified relative to the yaw bearing. Also, I've not personally used StC_CMODE = 1; does the simulation if your TMD is passive with StC_CMODE = 0?

Best regards,

@3sdb
Copy link
Author

3sdb commented May 21, 2024

Dear @jjonkman ,
Thank you for the answer, it's really a question, and now I don't make a mistake when simulating, but I still want to ask where I can find the yaw bearing and the location of the center (I'm doing research on damper damping)
Best regards,

@jjonkman
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @3sdb,

In OpenFAST, the center of the yaw bearing is user-specified via ElastoDyn input TowerHt.

Best regards,

@3sdb
Copy link
Author

3sdb commented May 23, 2024

Hello@jjonkman ,
Thank you, I also found your parameters, I have a new doubt: what is the size of the damper in OpenFast and is there a manual for designing the damper, at the moment I am using the data that comes with the downloaded 5MW, the shock absorption effect is not very good, almost similar to the effect without the damper, so I think the parameters of the damper (stiffness, damping) are set incorrectly.
Best regards,

@jjonkman
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @3sdb,

The OpenFAST r-test cases with the Structural Controller (StC) submodel of ServoDyn enabled are set up more to test that StC is working as expected rather than as examples of optimal StC configurations.

NREL has not provided guidance on how to design TMDs, but the NREL-provided documentation does describe how the StC submodel is implemented in OpenFAST and how to use it: https://openfast.readthedocs.io/en/main/source/user/servodyn-stc/StC_index.html. I'm sure you can find relevant literature on how to design optimal TMDs.

Best regards,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants