Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug Report: Combination of Mod_AmbWind=3 with WindType=5 in FAST.Farm #471

Open
jjonkman opened this issue Jun 17, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@jjonkman
Copy link
Collaborator

A Mod_AmbWind = 3 option was recently added to FAST.Farm to support the modeling of ambient wind across the wind farm via an interface to the InflowWind module, with multiple instances of InflowWind for the low-resolution domain and high-resolution domain for each wind turbine in the farm. While this capability should work as intended for InflowWind wind data type (WindType) = 1 (steady), 2 (uniform), 3 (full-field turbulence in TurbSim format), and 4 (full-field turbulence in Bladed format), the implementation does not properly support WindType = 5 (full-field turbulence in HAWC format, for the Mann model). The user needs to be able to specify unique values of nx, ny, nz, dx, dy, dz, and RefHt for each Mann file / domain, but the code only allows the user to specify one value each for all files. This is a bug that needs to be fixed. Until this bug can be fixed, Mod_AmbWind=3 should not be combined with WindType=5.

FYI: FAST.Farm is being developed in a fork of OpenFAST and will be merged into OpenFAST-dev soon.

deslaughter added a commit to andrew-platt/openfast that referenced this issue Jul 14, 2023
There was a bug where the modulo operation to wrap back to the beginning
of the wind file didn't work correctly, previously noted in issue OpenFAST#471.
This seemed to come back due to some changes in the IfW refactor.
The ifw_HAWC regression test was added to catch this and other IfW
changes in the future.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant