WIP working llvm-90 #5389

Toasterson · 2019-11-12T10:26:48Z

This is a compiling version of LLVM and clang 9 analogous to pkgsrc with patches from pkgsrc

Building this on my build system takes 12 hours!!! I would thus be glad if somebody could take over polishing this.

The option CMAKE_OPTIONS += -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON does not work for us although it seems to wotk for pkgsrc libLTO does not want to link. It is optional as shared libraries are still generated without it but all shrared libraries are not linked against one another but rather statically linked. Which makes them slightly bigger but it at least compiles.

@Mno-hime I have built without ninja as it made no difference in the end result. Feel free to add it again if you want.

Mno-hime · 2019-11-12T16:39:03Z

Obsoleted clang-80 component. Publishing fixes. Makefile modernization.

Mno-hime · 2019-11-12T17:41:51Z

Firefox should be rebuild (#5394) after this one is merged.

alarcher · 2019-11-12T20:53:34Z

Any chance to leave clang-80 for now?

…

On 11/12/19, Michal Nowak ***@***.***> wrote: Firefox should be rebuild (#5394) after this one is merged. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #5389 (comment)

-- --- Praise the Caffeine embeddings

Mno-hime · 2019-11-12T21:37:00Z

@Toasterson rust 1.37 (https://github.com/Toasterson/oi-userland/commits/rust-137) fails to build for me with this LLVM:

     Running `/userland/ws/oi-userland/components/developer/rust/build/amd64/build/x86_64-sun-solaris/stage0-codegen/release/build/rustc_llvm-0d412a82206d98c7/build-script-build`
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=REAL_LIBRARY_PATH_VAR
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=REAL_LIBRARY_PATH
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-changed=/usr/clang/9.0/bin/llvm-config
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=LLVM_CONFIG
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="aarch64"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="amdgpu"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="arm"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="asmparser"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="bitreader"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="bitwriter"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="hexagon"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="instrumentation"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="interpreter"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="ipo"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="linker"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="lto"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="mcjit"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="mips"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="msp430"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="nvptx"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="powerpc"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="riscv"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="sparc"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="systemz"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="webassembly"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rustc-cfg=llvm_component="x86"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-changed-env=LLVM_RUSTLLVM
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-changed=../rustllvm/rustllvm.h
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-changed=../rustllvm/.editorconfig
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-changed=../rustllvm/RustWrapper.cpp
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-changed=../rustllvm/Linker.cpp
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-changed=../rustllvm/README
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-changed=../rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:rerun-if-changed=../rustllvm/ArchiveWrapper.cpp
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] TARGET = Some("x86_64-sun-solaris")
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] OPT_LEVEL = Some("2")
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] HOST = Some("x86_64-sun-solaris")
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] CXX_x86_64-sun-solaris = Some("/usr/gcc/6/bin/g++")
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] CXXFLAGS_x86_64-sun-solaris = Some("-O2 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fPIC -m64 -m64 -O3 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS")
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] CRATE_CC_NO_DEFAULTS = None
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] DEBUG = Some("false")
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] CARGO_CFG_TARGET_FEATURE = Some("fxsr,mmx,sse,sse2")
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] running: "/usr/gcc/6/bin/g++" "-O2" "-ffunction-sections" "-fdata-sections" "-fPIC" "-m64" "-O2" "-ffunction-sections" "-fdata-sections" "-fPIC" "-m64" "-m64" "-O3" "-D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS" "-I/usr/clang/9.0/include" "-std=c++11" "-fno-exceptions" "-D_DEBUG" "-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS" "-D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS" "-D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_AARCH64" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_AMDGPU" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_ARM" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_ASMPARSER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_BITREADER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_BITWRITER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_HEXAGON" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_INSTRUMENTATION" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_INTERPRETER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_IPO" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_LINKER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_LTO" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_MCJIT" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_MIPS" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_MSP430" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_NVPTX" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_POWERPC" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_RISCV" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_SPARC" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_SYSTEMZ" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_WEBASSEMBLY" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_X86" "-o" "/userland/ws/oi-userland/components/developer/rust/build/amd64/build/x86_64-sun-solaris/stage0-codegen/x86_64-sun-solaris/release/build/rustc_llvm-2ac19e32c1d0d622/out/../rustllvm/PassWrapper.o" "-c" "../rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp"
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:warning=../rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp: In function 'LLVMRustThinLTOData* LLVMRustCreateThinLTOData(LLVMRustThinLTOModule*, int, const char**, int)':
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:warning=../rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp:917:77: error: too few arguments to function 'void llvm::thinLTOResolvePrevailingInIndex(llvm::ModuleSummaryIndex&, llvm::function_ref<bool(long unsigned int, const llvm::GlobalValueSummary*)>, llvm::function_ref<void(llvm::StringRef, long unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes)>, const llvm::DenseSet<long unsigned int>&)'
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:warning=   thinLTOResolvePrevailingInIndex(Ret->Index, isPrevailing, recordNewLinkage);
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:warning=                                                                             ^
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:warning=In file included from ../rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp:22:0:
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:warning=/usr/clang/9.0/include/llvm/LTO/LTO.h:49:6: note: declared here
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:warning= void thinLTOResolvePrevailingInIndex(
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] cargo:warning=      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] thread 'main' panicked at '
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] 
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] Internal error occurred: Command "/usr/gcc/6/bin/g++" "-O2" "-ffunction-sections" "-fdata-sections" "-fPIC" "-m64" "-O2" "-ffunction-sections" "-fdata-sections" "-fPIC" "-m64" "-m64" "-O3" "-D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS" "-I/usr/clang/9.0/include" "-std=c++11" "-fno-exceptions" "-D_DEBUG" "-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS" "-D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS" "-D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_AARCH64" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_AMDGPU" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_ARM" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_ASMPARSER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_BITREADER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_BITWRITER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_HEXAGON" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_INSTRUMENTATION" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_INTERPRETER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_IPO" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_LINKER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_LTO" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_MCJIT" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_MIPS" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_MSP430" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_NVPTX" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_POWERPC" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_RISCV" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_SPARC" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_SYSTEMZ" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_WEBASSEMBLY" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_X86" "-o" "/userland/ws/oi-userland/components/developer/rust/build/amd64/build/x86_64-sun-solaris/stage0-codegen/x86_64-sun-solaris/release/build/rustc_llvm-2ac19e32c1d0d622/out/../rustllvm/PassWrapper.o" "-c" "../rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp" with args "g++" did not execute successfully (status code exit code: 1).
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] exit code: 1
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] 
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] ', /userland/ws/oi-userland/components/developer/rust/build/amd64/vendor/cc/src/lib.rs:2398:5
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0] stack backtrace:
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]    0: std::sys::unix::backtrace::tracing::imp::unwind_backtrace
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]    1: std::sys_common::backtrace::print
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]    2: std::panicking::default_hook::{{closure}}
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]    3: std::panicking::default_hook
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]    4: std::panicking::rust_panic_with_hook
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]    5: std::panicking::continue_panic_fmt
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]    6: std::panicking::begin_panic_fmt
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]    7: cc::fail
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]    8: cc::Build::compile
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]    9: build_script_build::main
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]   10: std::rt::lang_start::{{closure}}
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]   11: std::panicking::try::do_call
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]   12: __rust_maybe_catch_panic
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]   13: std::rt::lang_start_internal
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]   14: main
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]   15: _start_crt
[rustc_llvm 0.0.0]   16: _start

Any ideas?

Mno-hime · 2019-11-12T21:38:33Z

Any chance to leave clang-80 for now?

Sure. Any specific reason? In the past we shipped only on LLVM/Clang conponent.

Toasterson · 2019-11-12T21:55:08Z

@Mno-hime edit: sorry just saw that it is trying with the external llvm. This has not been updated before trying clang. So you probably need patches from pkgsrc and other stuff.

alarcher · 2019-11-13T14:41:42Z

Sure. Any specific reason? In the past we shipped only on LLVM/Clang component.

I use clang-80 for scientific computing projects (also scanbuild etc..) so if you remove the shared libs this is an issue for me. I am a real consumer of the compiler.

Mno-hime · 2019-11-21T07:40:11Z

Sure. Any specific reason? In the past we shipped only on LLVM/Clang component.

I use clang-80 for scientific computing projects (also scanbuild etc..) so if you remove the shared libs this is an issue for me. I am a real consumer of the compiler.

I see, sorry about that, clang-80 is back.

Mno-hime · 2019-11-21T07:46:56Z

@Mno-hime edit: sorry just saw that it is trying with the external llvm. This has not been updated before trying clang. So you probably need patches from pkgsrc and other stuff.

I see thanks.

Mno-hime · 2019-11-21T07:48:00Z

This builds for me, perhaps we can merge and start working on newer Rust?

Toasterson · 2019-11-21T08:15:23Z

I would say so.

Toasterson · 2019-12-11T14:53:29Z

Is something still missing other than an LGTM from me? (it's my pr so i can't review via Github)

pyhalov · 2019-12-11T15:33:49Z

Please, look through existing patches.

Check that _REENTRANT is set when -pthreads is used (not -pthread), GCC compat (look at https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/blob/oi/hipster/components/developer/clang-80/patches/05-pthreads.patch).
Check that rpath are properly passed to the linker (look at https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/blob/oi/hipster/components/developer/clang-80/patches/04-rpath.patch)
add https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/blob/oi/hipster/components/developer/clang-80/patches/02-gas.patch, we don't want llmv to call Sun as

pyhalov

Please, add missing patches from current clang.

cgrzemba · 2019-12-13T09:15:33Z

rust is not building for me because a of missing shared llvm libs, e.g. libLLVM-[789].so
pkgsrc delivers llvm sepearte from clang.

Mno-hime · 2019-12-18T06:44:18Z

@pyhalov cd519a7 brings those patches back.

Mno-hime · 2020-01-06T19:30:03Z

rust is not building for me because a of missing shared llvm libs, e.g. libLLVM-[789].so
pkgsrc delivers llvm sepearte from clang.

@cgrzemba This PR provides these libraries:

$ pkg contents clang-90 | grep libLLVM.*.so
usr/clang/9.0/lib/libLLVM-9.0.0.so
usr/clang/9.0/lib/libLLVM-9.so
usr/clang/9.0/lib/libLLVM.so

But still I can't build Rust (of any version) with it:

running: "/usr/gcc/6/bin/g++" "-O2" "-ffunction-sections" "-fdata-sections" "-fPIC" "-O2" "-ffunction-sections" "-fdata-sections" "-fPIC" "-m64" "-O3" "-D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS" "-m64" "-m64" "-I/usr/clang/9.0/include" "-std=c++11" "-fno-exceptions" "-D_DEBUG" "-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS" "-D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS" "-D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_AARCH64" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_AMDGPU" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_ARM" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_ASMPARSER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_BITREADER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_BITWRITER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_HEXAGON" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_INSTRUMENTATION" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_INTERPRETER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_IPO" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_LINKER" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_LTO" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_MCJIT" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_MIPS" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_MSP430" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_NVPTX" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_POWERPC" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_RISCV" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_SPARC" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_SYSTEMZ" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_WEBASSEMBLY" "-DLLVM_COMPONENT_X86" "-o" "/userland/ws/oi-userland/components/developer/rust/build/amd64/build/x86_64-sun-solaris/stage0-codegen/x86_64-sun-solaris/release/build/rustc_llvm-2b35a807e827cf30/out/../rustllvm/PassWrapper.o" "-c" "../rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp"
cargo:warning=../rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp: In function 'LLVMRustThinLTOData* LLVMRustCreateThinLTOData(LLVMRustThinLTOModule*, int, const char**, int)':
cargo:warning=../rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp:926:77: error: too few arguments to function 'void llvm::thinLTOResolvePrevailingInIndex(llvm::ModuleSummaryIndex&, llvm::function_ref<bool(long unsigned int, const llvm::GlobalValueSummary*)>, llvm::function_ref<void(llvm::StringRef, long unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes)>, const llvm::DenseSet<long unsigned int>&)'
cargo:warning=   thinLTOResolvePrevailingInIndex(Ret->Index, isPrevailing, recordNewLinkage);
cargo:warning=                                                                             ^
cargo:warning=In file included from ../rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp:38:0:
cargo:warning=/usr/clang/9.0/include/llvm/LTO/LTO.h:49:6: note: declared here
cargo:warning= void thinLTOResolvePrevailingInIndex(
cargo:warning=      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Toasterson · 2020-01-07T11:41:55Z

@Mno-hime which rust version are you trying to build? according to the Error Rust stumbles over an API change in libLTO (LLVM) our currently used version 1.32 will not build we will need to build at least 1.39 or later.

Mno-hime · 2020-01-08T08:59:22Z

@Toasterson I think that was 1.32.0 (the one we already ship), the point of the exercise is to see if the updated LLVM 9.0 is able to build the Rust we already have and then move to newer Rust versions.

I identified rust-lang/rust@04304fc as a way to pass this error. But that leads to another errors: https://paste.ec/paste/OOXJGm3p#tDKt0dlKIhadlj+E7C846jM7FuzJl1Jm3YZQ1v1E3wz.

Maybe we should fix LLVM 8.0 instead and build Rust with it.

Toasterson · 2020-01-08T11:14:50Z

Knowing Rust and LLVM the API's both use are not stable at all. So you will need a version of Rust that is compatible with this exact version of LLVM. My guess is 1.32 is not compatible.

LLVM does not help us here.... The Request that set off this rabbit hole was from @jclulow . He and others want to get rust into illumos directly so that components of illumos can be written in rust. And that was for rust current.

I would skip 1.32 it's too old to be worth it.

despair86 · 2020-01-08T15:27:11Z

components/developer/clang-90/patches/08-gas.patch

+     CmdArgs.push_back(II.getFilename());
+
+-  const char *Exec = Args.MakeArgString(getToolChain().GetProgramPath("as"));
+  const char *Exec = Args.MakeArgString(getToolChain().GetProgramPath("gas"));


just curious, SPARC uses GNU as now? All IX86 targets supported by clang have long since used the integrated assembler, this statement has no effect as a result

Perhaps, this can be dropped, but this needs some testing.

Mno-hime · 2020-01-08T18:20:38Z

LLVM does not help us here.... The Request that set off this rabbit hole was from @jclulow . He and others want to get rust into illumos directly so that components of illumos can be written in rust. And that was for rust current.

This and newer Firefox, about which I am currently more interested in.

I would skip 1.32 it's too old to be worth it.

Well, yes, I just hoped for a base line to see if we got the LLVM side right...

I tried many other Rust versions up to 1.40.0 and all of them died somewhere. Some of them, I think telling me my local Rust did not support this or that construct of the Rust I was building... This is so hopeless that I seriously consider reading the rustc development manual :).

Toasterson · 2020-01-08T18:37:06Z

Yes you also need the correct rust to bootstrap the correct rust.

pyhalov · 2020-01-23T21:05:34Z

Seems to be fine, why can't we merge it?

Mno-hime · 2020-01-23T21:27:28Z

Seems to be fine, why can't we merge it?

I think we can. But technically you request changes to this PR down here :).

pyhalov · 2020-01-24T07:29:31Z

@Toasterson Test results are missing

Toasterson · 2020-01-24T09:56:13Z

@pyhalov Yes I never Managed to compile the latest version due to My machine being to slow. Running through the Suite will take me roughly 48 hours. If @Mno-hime could do It that would be best otherwise I could run it through the weekend if needed.

pyhalov · 2020-01-25T06:24:05Z

I'll merge this when check FF rebuild.

pyhalov · 2020-01-25T06:56:00Z

clang 9.0.1 is available

pyhalov · 2020-01-25T10:29:32Z

Have to update test results.

Toasterson · 2020-01-25T11:53:33Z

Thanks for the work much appreciated.

Till Wegmueller and others added 2 commits November 12, 2019 13:07

WIP working llvm-90

bff619e

Fixes

df84d77

Mno-hime mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2019

Rebuild Firefox after clang update to 9.0 #5394

Merged

Mno-hime added 2 commits November 21, 2019 08:35

Re-add clang-80

5364626

Do not obsolete clang-80

96bfdef

Mno-hime approved these changes Nov 21, 2019

View reviewed changes

pyhalov requested changes Dec 12, 2019

View reviewed changes

Add missing patches

cd519a7

Mno-hime requested a review from pyhalov December 18, 2019 06:43

Build with -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON

b919f27

despair86 reviewed Jan 8, 2020

View reviewed changes

pyhalov approved these changes Jan 23, 2020

View reviewed changes

clang-9: add test results

bf697fe

clang: update to 9.0.1

2e1427d

clang-90: update test results

618873d

pyhalov merged commit 5855e58 into OpenIndiana:oi/hipster Jan 25, 2020

Toasterson deleted the clang9 branch January 25, 2020 11:53

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

WIP working llvm-90 #5389

WIP working llvm-90 #5389

Toasterson commented Nov 12, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 12, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 12, 2019

alarcher commented Nov 12, 2019 via email

Mno-hime commented Nov 12, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 12, 2019

Toasterson commented Nov 12, 2019 •

edited

alarcher commented Nov 13, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 21, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 21, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 21, 2019

Toasterson commented Nov 21, 2019

Toasterson commented Dec 11, 2019

pyhalov commented Dec 11, 2019

pyhalov left a comment

cgrzemba commented Dec 13, 2019

Mno-hime commented Dec 18, 2019

Mno-hime commented Jan 6, 2020

Toasterson commented Jan 7, 2020

Mno-hime commented Jan 8, 2020

Toasterson commented Jan 8, 2020

despair86 Jan 8, 2020

pyhalov Jan 10, 2020

Mno-hime commented Jan 8, 2020

Toasterson commented Jan 8, 2020

pyhalov commented Jan 23, 2020

Mno-hime commented Jan 23, 2020

pyhalov commented Jan 24, 2020

Toasterson commented Jan 24, 2020

pyhalov commented Jan 25, 2020

pyhalov commented Jan 25, 2020

pyhalov commented Jan 25, 2020

Toasterson commented Jan 25, 2020

WIP working llvm-90 #5389

WIP working llvm-90 #5389

Conversation

Toasterson commented Nov 12, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 12, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 12, 2019

alarcher commented Nov 12, 2019 via email

Mno-hime commented Nov 12, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 12, 2019

Toasterson commented Nov 12, 2019 • edited

alarcher commented Nov 13, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 21, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 21, 2019

Mno-hime commented Nov 21, 2019

Toasterson commented Nov 21, 2019

Toasterson commented Dec 11, 2019

pyhalov commented Dec 11, 2019

pyhalov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cgrzemba commented Dec 13, 2019

Mno-hime commented Dec 18, 2019

Mno-hime commented Jan 6, 2020

Toasterson commented Jan 7, 2020

Mno-hime commented Jan 8, 2020

Toasterson commented Jan 8, 2020

despair86 Jan 8, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pyhalov Jan 10, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Mno-hime commented Jan 8, 2020

Toasterson commented Jan 8, 2020

pyhalov commented Jan 23, 2020

Mno-hime commented Jan 23, 2020

pyhalov commented Jan 24, 2020

Toasterson commented Jan 24, 2020

pyhalov commented Jan 25, 2020

pyhalov commented Jan 25, 2020

pyhalov commented Jan 25, 2020

Toasterson commented Jan 25, 2020

Toasterson commented Nov 12, 2019 •

edited