Get claims from JwtToken instead of the JSON string representation #20700
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
jhanders34
commented
Apr 4, 2022
jhanders34
commented
- Use the existing JwtToken instead of a JSON version in order to get the needed claims for processing a JwtToken.
- Use the existing JwtToken instead of a JSON version in order to get the needed claims for processing a JwtToken.
|
#build |
Code analysis and actionsDO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
|
|
Your personal build request is at https://wasrtc.hursley.ibm.com:9443/jazz/resource/itemOid/com.ibm.team.build.BuildResult/_ovgFULQcEey_l6cwP43xMA Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees. |
|
The build jhanders34-20700-20220404-1204 |
utle
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2022
jdmcclur
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2022
jhanders34
added a commit
to jhanders34/open-liberty
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2022
- Continuation of some of the changes in OpenLiberty#20700 - Update to not parse the json string to create the JsonWebToken by using the claims in the JwtToken - Change not to create the supported config property names over and over instead of using a constant - Add test that shows that the OpenLiberty#20700 and this PR's changes do not change behavior. - Some additional small changes found along the way from looking at profiles.
jhanders34
added a commit
to jhanders34/open-liberty
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2022
- Continuation of some of the changes in OpenLiberty#20700 - Update to not parse the json string to create the JsonWebToken by using the claims in the JwtToken - Change not to create the supported config property names over and over instead of using a constant - Add test that shows that the OpenLiberty#20700 and this PR's changes do not change behavior. - Some additional small changes found along the way from looking at profiles.
jhanders34
added a commit
to jhanders34/open-liberty
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2022
- Continuation of some of the changes in OpenLiberty#20700 - Update to not parse the json string to create the JsonWebToken by using the claims in the JwtToken - Change not to create the supported config property names over and over instead of using a constant - Add test that shows that the OpenLiberty#20700 and this PR's changes do not change behavior. - Some additional small changes found along the way from looking at profiles.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.