Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Community Server Provider #122

Closed
rhysgodfrey opened this issue Dec 13, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Update Community Server Provider #122

rhysgodfrey opened this issue Dec 13, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@rhysgodfrey
Copy link
Contributor

"Community Server" appears as an option in the Blog Providers list.

"Community Server" has been re-branded under different names since version 5.x (released around 2009/10), primarily as "Telligent Community" (or some form of this), for a brief period it was known as "Zimbra Social (version 8.x)", and is now back to Telligent.

In version 8.x the URLs for the metablog API were updated, this, along with the old name, make the process of setting up a Telligent blog confusing.

Thinking that "Community Server" should be updated to the more widely used "Telligent Community", and an extra provider added with the new URL structure for version 8.x+. How does that sound?

I've given the changes a go in this branch: https://github.com/rhysgodfrey/OpenLiveWriter/tree/update-telligent-provider, but would be good to get some guidance on if the changes are wanted and acceptable before opening a PR :)

@ScottIsAFool
Copy link
Member

I don't see why this shouldn't be submitted as a PR.

@martinwoodward
Copy link
Member

+1 - send a PR in for it @rhysgodfrey - I'm not sure that all the market XML files are needed but the folks that would know can comment on the PR when they do. When you submit it be sure to add in the comment that "this fixes #122"

@rhysgodfrey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks Both! PR Submitted :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants