Fix BLAS and LAPACK tests for C910V and RISCV64_ZVL256B targets #4454
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Fixed bugs in dgemm, [a]min\max, asum kernels * Added zero checks for BLAS kernels * Added dsdot implementation for RVV 0.7.1 * Fixed bugs in _vector files for C910V and RISCV64_ZVL256B targets * Added additional definitions for RISCV64_ZVL256B target
AndreySokolovSC
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
dgemm(), [a]min()\max(),asum()kernelsdsdot()implementation for RVV 0.7.1RISCV64_ZVL256BtargetAll BLAS tests passed.
С910 LAPACK tests (Fortran sources, Int32):
SUMMARY nb test run numerical error other error
================ =========== ================= ================
REAL 1318557 97 (0.007%) 0 (0.000%)
DOUBLE PRECISION 1327845 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%)
COMPLEX 786775 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%)
COMPLEX16 787842 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%)
--> ALL PRECISIONS 4221019 97 (0.002%) 0 (0.000%)
C LAPACK sources, Int32\64 is simular with fixes from #4453
97 fails for SHSEQR function and its related with C910 gemm kernel. We haven't been able to find the cause of the problem yet.
RISCV64_ZVL256B LAPACK tests (Fortran sources, Int32):
SUMMARY nb test run numerical error other error
================ =========== ================= ================
REAL 1327023 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%)
DOUBLE PRECISION 1327845 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%)
COMPLEX 786775 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%)
COMPLEX16 787842 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%)
--> ALL PRECISIONS 4229485 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%)