New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Veilid Chunking #8558
Merged
Merged
Veilid Chunking #8558
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ceive_stream Make notebooks compatible with new VeilidStreamer and refactor Lots of other refactoring and cleanup
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Make VeilidStreamer a singleton Add notebooks to test sending large messages using /app_call endpoint
- Make code more robust and add support for sending messages above 16 MB - Refactor and make code cleaner
… into tauquir/veilid-chunking
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 18, 2024
- Improve performance for single chunk streams
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 19, 2024
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 19, 2024
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 19, 2024
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 19, 2024
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 19, 2024
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 20, 2024
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 20, 2024
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 20, 2024
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 20, 2024
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 20, 2024
rasswanth-s
commented
Mar 20, 2024
- Change Call ID to Stream ID throughout VeilidStreamer - Clean up VeilidStreamer.__init__ method by moving the initialization of structs, message sizes, and semaphores to separate methods - Clean up the VeilidStreamer.stream method by moving the logic to wait for reply and sending single and multi chunk requests to separate methods - Add a new method to cleanup the buffer after the stream is complete - Other minor changes
itstauq
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2024
fix peer client caching with node uid + route
Stellar Work @itstauq ⭐ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Re-opening @itstauq veilid chunking PR.
Description
Veilid can send at most 32 kb of data in one network call. However the requests-responses from PySyft can be larger than than. This PR contains utilities to send and receive larger data by chunking the data into packets of max 32 kb.
Items to cover in later cuts:
This PR closes https://github.com/OpenMined/Heartbeat/issues/1076
Affected Dependencies
None
How has this been tested?
notebooks/Testing/Veilid/Large-Message-Testing.ipynb
Checklist