Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

serializing large objs #8715

Merged
merged 13 commits into from Apr 18, 2024
Merged

serializing large objs #8715

merged 13 commits into from Apr 18, 2024

Conversation

eelcovdw
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Please include a summary of the change, the motivation, and any additional context that will help others understand your PR. If it closes one or more open issues, please tag them as described here.

Affected Dependencies

List any dependencies that are required for this change.

How has this been tested?

  • Describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.
  • Provide instructions so we can reproduce.
  • List any relevant details for your test configuration.

Checklist

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm adding a more up-to-date version of these files in this PR - https://github.com/OpenMined/PySyft/pull/8712/files

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change was merged along with the devspace profile, so you can remove this file =)

@koenvanderveen koenvanderveen changed the title [WIP] serializing large objs serializing large objs Apr 18, 2024
@koenvanderveen koenvanderveen merged commit 891c550 into dev Apr 18, 2024
35 checks passed
@koenvanderveen koenvanderveen deleted the eelco/serializing-large-objs branch April 18, 2024 18:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants