-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HuaXiang] 10309 #76
[HuaXiang] 10309 #76
Conversation
1.We deleted the "Bluetooth" resource,because it isn't the best way to use a specific Wireless chip. 2.We deleted the "LockState" resource,because we can deduce it from other factors. 2.For different application scenarios,we added the "LockType" resource . 3.We changed the "LightState" to "LightSwitchState". 4.For Knowing the device of Wireless state,we added the "RSSI" resource. 5.We changed the "UpTime" to "DataUpTime" and the resource's String types to Time. 6.And we added two new resources variables,which are "Latitude" and "Longitude". "Latitude",which ID is 5514. "Longitude",which ID is 5515.
update file name from ShareParkingLock to 10309.
@dengjialean
|
1.We decided to change the name of object 10309 "DeviceDataContainer" to "ShareParkingLock". 2.We think this object should be public.
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "Joaquin"<notifications@github.com>;
发送时间: 2019年2月28日(星期四) 晚上9:48
收件人: "OpenMobileAlliance/lwm2m-registry"<lwm2m-registry@noreply.github.com>;
抄送: "邓嘉"<280858922@qq.com>; "Mention"<mention@noreply.github.com>;
主题: Re: [OpenMobileAlliance/lwm2m-registry] [HuaXiang] 10309 (#76)
@dengjialean
We need to resolve the following issues:
Is "ShareParkingLock" a replacement of "DeviceDataContainer"?
Software license is too restricted. By setting the copyright to Hua Xiang all rights reserved, other companies won't be able to use this Object. Are you considering to have a more open software license?
Incorrect schema filename: LWM2M-v1_0.xsd, should be name LWM2M.xsd.
LwM2M schema is set to v1.0 but the "LWM2MVersion" of the protocol is set to "1.1". This is incorrect. You need to decide if this Object is release for version 1.0 or v1.1 of LwM2M protocol.
URN is set to urn:oma:lwm2m10309:1.0, as this object is the first version (1.0), there is no need to add the Object version to the URN. Therefore, URN needs to be changed to: urn:oma:lwm2m10309
Once the above issues are addressed, we will validate the Object
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Dear Joaquin,
I'm honored to receive your letter.
I have answered your question one by one.
Please check it on GitHub.
Tank you for your contribution,we beae it in mand.
Best wishes to you.
|
The content of this file has been moved to 10309.xml object
We advise you to use functionality from existing objects instead of creating a new object. For instance, please consider the following:
|
|
Editorial changes to range an enumeration and descriptions.
Using the decomposition we recommended would have preferable, but given your urgency, we have made only minor edits. In the future we will provide better guidelines for best practices. |
new pull request template