Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: RHICOMPL-3900 disable required ruby version rubocop check #56

Merged

Conversation

marleystipich2
Copy link
Collaborator

Disabling the Gemspec/RequiredRubyVersion because we don't want to limit the supported ruby version because of static analysis.

@marleystipich2 marleystipich2 changed the title chore: disable required ruby version rubocop check fix: RHICOMPL-3900 disable required ruby version rubocop check Jul 13, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (229da90) 37.55% compared to head (03e6600) 37.55%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #56   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.55%   37.55%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         490      490           
=======================================
  Hits          184      184           
  Misses        306      306           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Collaborator

@skateman skateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Seal of Approval

@skateman skateman merged commit 62de6ab into OpenSCAP:master Jul 13, 2023
2 checks passed
@ekohl
Copy link
Contributor

ekohl commented Oct 12, 2023

I'd say this is not good for consumers of the gem. Having a lower bound is really useful. I assume this only runs on Ruby 2.7+ so at least stating that in the gemspec would be great.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants