Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

b2bua: Add AVP-based authentication #7

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

shimaore
Copy link
Contributor

We've had the code in 30b6543 in production for some time (with OpenSIPS 1.8.2), but I never got to submitting it.

This adds support for AVP-based authentication in the B2BUA modules; if activated this replaces uac_auth-based authentication.
The AVP names can be defined in the configuration of the b2b_logic module.

This is probably missing some steps for inclusion (documentation, style, ..), let me know.

@bogdan-iancu
Copy link
Member

The problem of dynamic credentials for B2B auth was addressed in a different way in commit 74f1c14 - the auth_[realm|username|password]_avp parameters were moved from UAC module to UAC_AUTH module.

@mnunzi mnunzi mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2013
@kaduww kaduww mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2014
@apsaras apsaras mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2014
@syco syco mentioned this pull request Jul 16, 2014
@adigeo adigeo mentioned this pull request May 21, 2020
@AnjanIpc AnjanIpc mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2020
@caloveri caloveri mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2020
@AnjanIpc AnjanIpc mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2020
sobomax added a commit to sippy/opensips that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2020
Case OpenSIPS#6 and Case OpenSIPS#7 to fail instead.

Improve test_parse_authenticate_body() logic: don't run checks if
test fail.

GC stray debug output.
sobomax added a commit to sippy/opensips that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2020
Case OpenSIPS#6 and Case OpenSIPS#7 to fail instead.

Improve test_parse_authenticate_body() logic: don't run checks if
test fail.

GC stray debug output.
@adigeo adigeo mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2021
@prathibhacdac prathibhacdac mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants