Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update attention flag logic for abnormal abdominal exam reasons & Abnormal pelvic exam #368

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Oct 11, 2019

Conversation

@dubdabasoduba
Copy link
Member

dubdabasoduba commented Oct 7, 2019

Fixes #362
Fixes #363

@dubdabasoduba dubdabasoduba requested a review from ellykits Oct 7, 2019
@dubdabasoduba dubdabasoduba self-assigned this Oct 7, 2019
@dubdabasoduba dubdabasoduba changed the base branch from master to develop Oct 7, 2019
@codeclimate

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Oct 7, 2019

Code Climate has analyzed commit bbf38aa and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 7, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2314

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 35.359%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2307: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2508
Relevant Lines: 7093

💛 - Coveralls
@dubdabasoduba dubdabasoduba changed the title Update attention flag logic for abnormal abdominal exam reasons Update attention flag logic for abnormal abdominal exam reasons & Abnormal pelvic exam Oct 7, 2019
…issue-362
…o issue-362
@ndegwamartin ndegwamartin merged commit 74b89a8 into develop Oct 11, 2019
3 of 4 checks passed
3 of 4 checks passed
Codacy/PR Quality Review Hang in there, Codacy is reviewing your Pull request.
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed
Details
coverage/coveralls Coverage remained the same at 35.359%
Details
@dubdabasoduba dubdabasoduba deleted the issue-362 branch Oct 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.