Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #148: better component automatic generation #149

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023
Merged

Fix #148: better component automatic generation #149

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

labordep
Copy link
Member

@labordep labordep commented Dec 8, 2023

now based on the type class content (not on the implementation class content which can be different)

…browser, the type is not already installed into the implementation class. The problem was that we considere the contract definition into the implementation class but in reality this is in the type class. The implementation should be not up to date regarding the type class definition and be edited with a risk of desync between the type contract trait and the implementation contract trait.
@labordep labordep added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 8, 2023
@labordep labordep self-assigned this Dec 8, 2023
@labordep labordep merged commit d60878e into main Dec 8, 2023
12 checks passed
@labordep labordep deleted the 148-dev branch December 8, 2023 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant