Document license status of source sounds #5
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jan 25, 2021
Wuzzy2
force-pushed
the
license-research
branch
from
df9af6a
to
8f8fd7d
Compare
|
Superceded by #8. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have looked up all the sound sources mentioned in the README and made the list more accessible by also including the URL (if possible) and sorting everything by license. This will help a lot with the 'liberation' (#2). =)
In the README there were also various false claims about the legal status, such as that OpenSFX really is 'open source' (which definitely it isn't because of CC Sampling Plus), so I replaced those with more direct and clarifying language.
I have checked if I did not accidentally remove a sound from the list, just to be sure. But please look closely at my edit for yourself.