Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New tile group #348

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2019
Merged

Conversation

lijing0010
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Jing Li added 2 commits September 3, 2019 10:35
Signed-off-by: Jing Li <jing.b.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jing Li <jing.b.li@intel.com>
@tianjunwork tianjunwork added the Clean up A cleaner implementation or improved functionality label Sep 3, 2019
@lijing0010 lijing0010 merged commit 9c4e34b into OpenVisualCloud:master Sep 3, 2019
1480c1 pushed a commit to 1480c1/SVT-HEVC that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2019
* Enable tile group for better tile parallelism

Signed-off-by: Jing Li <jing.b.li@intel.com>

* set reference info

Signed-off-by: Jing Li <jing.b.li@intel.com>
Austin-Hu added a commit to Austin-Hu/SVT-HEVC that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2019
… set.

It's a regressoin caused by PR OpenVisualCloud#348, when the ImproveSharpness option is set.
But the issue didn't happen for 8K input. So worked around this issue except
for 4K input.

Signed-off-by: Austin Hu <austin.hu@intel.com>
Austin-Hu added a commit to Austin-Hu/SVT-HEVC that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2019
The regression was caused by the tile group implementation (PR OpenVisualCloud#348),
when ImproveSharpness is used, as it would impact the QP values of
each CU and latter mode decision process.

So temporarily work around the issue and need to fix it in the future.

Signed-off-by: Austin Hu <austin.hu@intel.com>
Austin-Hu added a commit to Austin-Hu/SVT-HEVC that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2019
The regression was caused by the tile group implementation (PR OpenVisualCloud#348),
when ImproveSharpness is used, as it would impact the QP values of
each CU and latter mode decision process.

So temporarily work around the issue and need to fix it in the future.

Signed-off-by: Austin Hu <austin.hu@intel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Clean up A cleaner implementation or improved functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants