Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 3, 2019. It is now read-only.

Restrictions in Dykstra #236

Closed
dvv153m opened this issue May 15, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Restrictions in Dykstra #236

dvv153m opened this issue May 15, 2015 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@dvv153m
Copy link

dvv153m commented May 15, 2015

When do you plan to make support restrictions in Dykstra.cs.

@xivk xivk added the question label May 18, 2015
@xivk
Copy link
Contributor

xivk commented May 18, 2015

Support was there but in the current version it's disabled again due to a few problems. Fixing this is on the roadmap and should be done sometime during the next couple of months.

Feel free to try implementing this yourself, I can point you in the right direction if you want... 👍

@xivk xivk closed this as completed May 18, 2015
@hernansinc
Copy link

Hello,
First of all thank for the good job here :) ...currently I'm trying to use your wonderful library for a university project and I would like to know if there is a version that could support the turn restriction and turn-u restriction as well? I read the code of the release version but I realized that it's commented those lines.
Thanks for everything and your time.
Best Regards
Hernan

@xivk
Copy link
Contributor

xivk commented Jun 13, 2016

@hernansinc The routing-part of OsmSharp has move to a different project. Turn-restrictions are supported, check here:

https://github.com/itinero/routing

@stephan75
Copy link

@xivk
I didn't know about that outsourcing of the router component, nor about the name itinero ...

Has there ever be an announcement about that "new" routing engine?
Is it mentioned in any part of documentation?

@xivk
Copy link
Contributor

xivk commented Jun 15, 2016

No announcement yet but your question was best answered by pointing to the new codebase. Release and announcement here is planned for July.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants