PREreviewer workflows A and B

[dasaderi]

PREreviewer workflow as presented by @elena-herrera:

[dasaderi]

My comment:

Here I think there are two workflows: A) The general PREreviewer workflow, which is when a PREreviewer submits a rapid review and possibly a long-form review to a preprint that is published on OPS-based preprint server independently of it appearing as having a request for feedback or not. This would mean establishing a direct stream of reviews with the preprint server similar to what currently happens on bioRxiv/medRxiv right now e.g., https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.04.187583v1, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.22.20025460v2. SciELO would NOT activate this workflow. B) The responder to feedback PREreviewer workflow, which is when a PREreviewer filters for and finds on PREreview a preprint published on OPS-based servers for which the author has solicited feedback. Once they submit a rapid review and possibly a long-form review, notification(s) is/are sent to the preprint server who requested that feedback so that 1) that review can be linked/displayed alongside the preprint and b) the authors can get an email notifying them that someone has reviewed their preprint with links to the reviews.

[elena-herrera]

@dasaderi: I share with you a couple of new diagrams, according to your comment, I consider that in this case, the most viable option is option B.
Diagram A

Diagram B

[dasaderi]

This looks good. Thank you, @elena-herrera.