Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CORE-2059] Removed Security Center tagging Policy #2275

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

arunpaladin
Copy link
Collaborator

@arunpaladin arunpaladin commented Jun 21, 2024

Description

Removed Security Center tagging Policy and updated the target type to finding.
Added script in the JIRA# CORE-2059 for closing the existing violations.

Problem

Solution

Fixes # (issue if any)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Chore (no code changes)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also
list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • My commit message/PR follows the contribution guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

Other Information:

List any documentation updates that are needed for the Wiki

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new policy related to Security Center, enhancing security monitoring capabilities.
  • Improvements

    • Updated resolution URLs for various policies, providing more accurate and relevant documentation links.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@arunpaladin has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 45 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d080513 and 0cf3565.

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance the database scripts for PACBot application, specifically focusing on adding a new securitycenter entry to cf_Target table and inserting new policies, along with updating resolution URLs in the cf_PolicyTable for better tagging and management of various cloud services.

Changes

Files Summary
installer/.../pacbot_app/files/DB.sql Inserted a new securitycenter entry into cf_Target with status update and on DUPLICATE key statement.
installer/.../pacbot_app/files/DB_Policy.sql Added a new policy for Security Center and updated resolution URLs for several policies in cf_PolicyTable.

Poem

In code we trust, with data pure and bright,
New entries weave a tapestry in flight.
Policies refined with URLs so neat,
Guarding the cloud in an orchestrated feat.
PacBot evolves, a guardian so wise,
With every change, we watch it rise. 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01060f4 and d080513.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • installer/resources/pacbot_app/files/DB.sql (1 hunks)
  • installer/resources/pacbot_app/files/DB_Policy.sql (3 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
  • installer/resources/pacbot_app/files/DB_Policy.sql (Error: unable to parse review)
Additional comments not posted (3)
installer/resources/pacbot_app/files/DB.sql (3)

2729-2732: Transaction handling looks good.

The transaction block ensures that the operations are atomic, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity when modifying entries in the database.


2732-2732: Additional INSERT statements are correctly formatted.

The remaining INSERT IGNORE statements are well-formed and correctly use the INSERT IGNORE clause to prevent errors from duplicate entries. This is suitable for cases where it's acceptable not to update existing records.
[APROVED]


2730-2731: Ensure correct handling of duplicate keys.

The on DUPLICATE key update clause is used appropriately to update the status field to 'finding' when a duplicate key is encountered. Please verify that the status field is the only field that should be updated in case of duplicates.

Copy link

⚠️ DELETE statement found in the changes of SQL files. Requesting review from @santhosh and @Arun.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 21, 2024

@santhosh-challa santhosh-challa merged commit 976251e into master Jun 25, 2024
59 checks passed
@santhosh-challa santhosh-challa deleted the fix/azure-security-center-fix branch June 25, 2024 06:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants