You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
FG-MPI provides zero-copy send-recv, which we can/should use within a node.
This might require some changes to memory allocation, especially in transpose, but I need to think about this more.
int MPIX_Zsend(const void **, int, MPI_Datatype, int, int, MPI_Comm);
int MPIX_Izsend(const void **, int, MPI_Datatype, int, int, MPI_Comm, MPI_Request *);
int MPIX_Zrecv(void **, int, MPI_Datatype, int, int, MPI_Comm, MPI_Status *);
int MPIX_Izrecv(void **, int, MPI_Datatype, int, int, MPI_Comm, MPI_Request *);
Particularly since I am working on ownership-passing as a feature for MPI-4 (mpi-forum/mpi-issues#32), it would be good to show the value of this using the PRK.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FG-MPI provides zero-copy send-recv, which we can/should use within a node.
This might require some changes to memory allocation, especially in transpose, but I need to think about this more.
Particularly since I am working on ownership-passing as a feature for MPI-4 (mpi-forum/mpi-issues#32), it would be good to show the value of this using the PRK.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: