Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Circuitbreaker for timeout storage connectivity is using the wrong default #2994

Closed
andreasohlund opened this issue Oct 13, 2015 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@andreasohlund
Copy link
Member

The change to make it configurable seems to have changed it from 2 minutes to 2 seconds by misstake.

This is causing the endpoints to shutdown if there is a short glitch in connectivity.

Who's affected

All users on 5.1.0 and up

Symptoms

The endpoint is shutdown if storage is unreachable for more than 2 seconds

Workaround

Specify a explicit timeout value http://docs.particular.net/nservicebus/errors/critical-exception-for-timeout-outages

Original report

https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/particularsoftware/SI2T6SH8un0/yitr1H1ADwAJ

@indualagarsamy
Copy link
Contributor

So the proposed change would be to fix it here? From 2 seconds to 2 minutes.
https://github.com/Particular/NServiceBus/blob/master/src/NServiceBus.Core/Timeout/TimeoutManager.cs#L16

@andreasohlund
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, and also add a acceptance test that fakes a bad persister

@indualagarsamy
Copy link
Contributor

@colin-higgins - Can you ping me if you have questions?

@colin-higgins
Copy link

This was included with Ramon's https://github.com/Particular/PlatformDevelopment/issues/423 fixes as well as the acceptance test.

@timbussmann
Copy link
Contributor

@colin-higgins @andreasohlund @indualagarsamy seems like this was not merged to v6?

@andreasohlund
Copy link
Member Author

@timbussmann
Copy link
Contributor

yup, since this was "backported" to v6, we can close this again 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants