Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for non-bold bright colours #248

Closed
s-hamann opened this issue Jul 10, 2019 · 4 comments · Fixed by #623
Closed

Support for non-bold bright colours #248

s-hamann opened this issue Jul 10, 2019 · 4 comments · Fixed by #623
Labels
kind/bug Something isn't working

Comments

@s-hamann
Copy link

lsd supports lots of ANSI codes, but apparently not non-bold bright colours (90-97).

My $LS_COLORS contains *.tar=91, which is the ANSI code for bright red from the terminal's 16 colour palette. This works fine with GNU ls, i.e. .tar files are displayed in bright red but not bold text. lsd does not emit any ANSI colour sequence and my .tar files are displayed in regular foreground colour.

@s-hamann s-hamann added the kind/bug Something isn't working label Jul 10, 2019
@meain
Copy link
Member

meain commented Sep 18, 2020

This should be fixed now. We now have proper support for LS_COLORS.
Feel free to reopen if this still exists.

@meain meain closed this as completed Sep 18, 2020
@eliminmax
Copy link

I ran into this issue on version 0.20.1, as installed from both the .deb package and cargo

@meain
Copy link
Member

meain commented Dec 12, 2021

Ah, my bad. This actually still seems to be an issue.

@meain meain reopened this Dec 12, 2021
@meain
Copy link
Member

meain commented Jan 17, 2022

ref: sharkdp/lscolors#39

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants