New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Austere Command does not respect 711.4b and treats the converted mana cost of the back side of double-faced permanents as 0. #258

Open
vorpal-buildbot opened this Issue Jan 11, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@vorpal-buildbot
Contributor

vorpal-buildbot commented Jan 11, 2018

From Bug Blog.
Affects: [Austere Command]

Bug Blog Text: [Austere Command] does not respect 7114.b and treats the converted mana cost of the back side of double-faced permanents as 0.

@silasary

This comment has been minimized.

Member

silasary commented Jan 11, 2018

I don't think the comp rules count up to 7114.b 😉

@stash86

This comment has been minimized.

Collaborator

stash86 commented Jan 12, 2018

To make it complete

711.4b While a double-faced permanent’s back face is up, it has only the characteristics of its back face. However, its converted mana cost is calculated using the mana cost of its front face. If a permanent is copying the back face of a double-faced card (even if the card representing that copy is itself a double-faced card), the converted mana cost of that permanent is 0.

@stash86 stash86 changed the title from [Austere Command] does not respect 7114.b and treats the converted mana cost of the back side of double-faced permanents as 0. to [Austere Command] does not respect 711.4b and treats the converted mana cost of the back side of double-faced permanents as 0. Jan 12, 2018

@vorpal-buildbot vorpal-buildbot changed the title from [Austere Command] does not respect 711.4b and treats the converted mana cost of the back side of double-faced permanents as 0. to Austere Command does not respect 711.4b and treats the converted mana cost of the back side of double-faced permanents as 0. Mar 23, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment