-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 578
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use fermi sentence in qchem dipole and number functions #4546
Conversation
Hello. You may have forgotten to update the changelog!
|
[sc-43900] |
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4546 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.65% 99.65% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 376 376
Lines 33156 33152 -4
==========================================
- Hits 33042 33038 -4
Misses 114 114
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A couple of small suggestions for documentation changes, but looks good to me!
Co-authored-by: lillian542 <38584660+lillian542@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just some small clarifications and suggestions, happy to approve after
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯
Context:
The
qchem.particle_number
andqchem.fermionic_dipole
functions use a fermi sentence internally to represent a fermionic spin operator.Description of the Change:
Benefits:
Possible Drawbacks:
Related GitHub Issues: