Add operator IDs into the text based circuit draw function.

[JustinWoodring]

Context:
Per the associated issue "With the new functionality to assign "names" to gates, it might be worthwhile to have this information propagate to the printed circuit of qml.draw."

Description of the Change:
Modifies the printed text output resulting from qml.draw() to indicate the ids of operators.

def circuit(x,d):
    qml.RX(d, id="data", wires=0)
    qml.Rot(x, wires=0)
    return qml.expval(qml.PauliZ(0)) 
   
d = 0.123
x = np.array([0.863, 0.611, 0.281])
print(qml.draw(circuit)(*x,d))

Output:
0: ──RX(0.123,"data")──Rot(0.863,0.611,0.281)──┤ ⟨Z⟩

Benefits:
This allows users to see operators displayed with their ids in the printed circuit output.

Possible Drawbacks:
Too many rendered operators with ID's might consume more space causing the printed circuit to wrap more.

Related GitHub Issues:
This implements and closes #1397

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (970d30c) 99.64% compared to head (1bf1330) 99.64%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4749      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.64%   99.64%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         380      380              
  Lines       34242    33993     -249     
==========================================
- Hits        34121    33871     -250     
- Misses        121      122       +1     

Files	Coverage Δ
pennylane/drawer/draw.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pennylane/gradients/spsa_gradient.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
pennylane/operation.py	97.27% <100.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
pennylane/qnode.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...nnylane/templates/subroutines/arbitrary_unitary.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pennylane/transforms/core/transform_dispatcher.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 41 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[albi3ro]

Looks great to me 🎉 Nice to close such a backlogged issue.

No comments or concerns from my side. I'm happy to approve :)

[timmysilv]

🎉

updating the operator label also makes the ID appear in the MPL drawer, so I figure it wouldn't hurt to mention it's added there as well. otherwise lgtm!

[trbromley]

Thanks @JustinWoodring for your contribution! 🏆

This should be released as part of v0.34 in early January. If you would like us to tag you as part of our Twitter/X marketing, feel free to optionally share your handle here.

[JustinWoodring]

I don't use Twitter, but if you do similar stuff on LinkedIn, my LinkedIn is, https://www.linkedin.com/in/justin-woodring/ 😃

[trbromley]

Thanks!