Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pytorch implementation #3

Closed
Diego999 opened this issue Mar 2, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Pytorch implementation #3

Diego999 opened this issue Mar 2, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@Diego999
Copy link

Diego999 commented Mar 2, 2018

Hi,

I was really interested to use your model but unfortunately it is in Tensorflow (or Keras for the unofficial implementation). I propose here the Pytorch version (https://github.com/Diego999/pyGAT) where I obtained between 83.6-84.6 for the accuracy on the transductive learning in the cora task. If you would like to add it in your readme (didn't want to do a pull request for this).

Best,

@PetarV-
Copy link
Owner

PetarV- commented Mar 2, 2018

Hi Diego,

Thank you for your interest in GAT! Especially for putting in the effort to reproduce our result in PyTorch. This should be very helpful indeed.

Would you mind adding the citation reference to your README? I'll then gladly link to your repository from ours.

Thanks,
Petar

@Diego999
Copy link
Author

Diego999 commented Mar 2, 2018

Hi Petar,

Yes definitely ! It's done.

Best,

@PetarV- PetarV- closed this as completed in f96ff75 Mar 2, 2018
zhangtianer521 pushed a commit to zhangtianer521/GAT that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2018
@JsonAC
Copy link

JsonAC commented Dec 29, 2018

Hi,

I was really interested to use your model but unfortunately it is in Tensorflow (or Keras for the unofficial implementation). I propose here the Pytorch version (https://github.com/Diego999/pyGAT) where I obtained between 83.6-84.6 for the accuracy on the transductive learning in the cora task. If you would like to add it in your readme (didn't want to do a pull request for this).

Best,

hi, the training/testing split in your Pytorch implementation is different from that in the paper(GCNs, GAT). When I change your utils to follow the original split and change the random seed 10 times, the average accuracy falls to about 82.6%

@KL-ice
Copy link

KL-ice commented Sep 22, 2019

Hi,
I was really interested to use your model but unfortunately it is in Tensorflow (or Keras for the unofficial implementation). I propose here the Pytorch version (https://github.com/Diego999/pyGAT) where I obtained between 83.6-84.6 for the accuracy on the transductive learning in the cora task. If you would like to add it in your readme (didn't want to do a pull request for this).
Best,

hi, the training/testing split in your Pytorch implementation is different from that in the paper(GCNs, GAT). When I change your utils to follow the original split and change the random seed 10 times, the average accuracy falls to about 82.6%

Hello,
I have encountered the same problem as you. Have you solved the problem that the random seed has a big influence on the code of the pytorch version?
Thanks,
Ice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants