-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PSFConvolvedModel2D
and Upgrades to Modeling
#100
Conversation
Reminder to push changes to |
PSFConvolvedImageModel
PSFConvolvedImageModel
and Upgrades to Modeling
I've taken a look and run through the code. I'm able to reproduce the notebooks, and I like leaving the PSFModel in there for the time being but with the deprecation warning. Setting up the infrastructure to follow the astropy directory structrue make sense and hopefully will make it easier to move some things upstream |
PSFConvolvedImageModel
and Upgrades to ModelingPSFConvolvedModel2D
and Upgrades to Modeling
Thank you @crawfordsm! I will merge once tests pass. Also I did a minor last minute update, I renamed |
Enhancements:
close #57
close #55
close #99
Bug fixes:
fixes #20
fixes #87
fixes #105
fixes #106
This PR introduces upgrades to and deprecates the
PSFModel
class by introducing thePSFConvolvedModel2D
class (model). This PR also moves the fitting code to a modeling folder according to #99. Deprecation warning has been added toPSFModel
but it has not been removed. I will be removed in the next version of the code (likelyv0.5
, see ticket #102).For #87, I exposed the Astropy weights parameter in
petrofit.modeling.fitting.fit_model
so users can pass fitting weights using rms images. I have added this to the docs as well.