We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://github.com/ComputationalRadiationPhysics/NeuralSolvers/blob/acb61830c0f93a286b59caeacaa421291b3a76d3/PINNFramework/PINN.py#L323
https://github.com/ComputationalRadiationPhysics/NeuralSolvers/blob/acb61830c0f93a286b59caeacaa421291b3a76d3/PINNFramework/PINN.py#L461
I suppose it has to be 'self.pde_loss.hpm_model' instead of 'self.pinn_loss.hpm_model' since self.pinn_loss is a method
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fix spelling reported in issue #31. Fixing bugs reported in issue #30
ca2561f
Is fixed and can be used correctly with the next release.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
https://github.com/ComputationalRadiationPhysics/NeuralSolvers/blob/acb61830c0f93a286b59caeacaa421291b3a76d3/PINNFramework/PINN.py#L323
https://github.com/ComputationalRadiationPhysics/NeuralSolvers/blob/acb61830c0f93a286b59caeacaa421291b3a76d3/PINNFramework/PINN.py#L461
I suppose it has to be 'self.pde_loss.hpm_model' instead of 'self.pinn_loss.hpm_model' since self.pinn_loss is a method
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: