Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Results of your provided pre-trained model #11

Closed
cccccccczy opened this issue Dec 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Results of your provided pre-trained model #11

cccccccczy opened this issue Dec 30, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@cccccccczy
Copy link

Thanks for your great work! But the pre-trained model you provide cannot achieve the results in the paper. I saw the same reproducted results in a closed issue, could you please check whether you didn't upload the latest pre-trained model or maybe some other mistakes? Thanks~
Step: 0
Test_acc: 0.8905
average_mAP: 0.4038
mAP@0.1: 0.6551
mAP@0.2: 0.5836
mAP@0.3: 0.5052
mAP@0.4: 0.4158
mAP@0.5: 0.3245
mAP@0.6: 0.2266
mAP@0.7: 0.1161

@Pilhyeon
Copy link
Owner

Pilhyeon commented Jan 4, 2021

I'm sorry.
I found that the link to the pre-trained model was wrong, which is corrected now.
Please update the model file and re-evaluate the model.
Thanks!

@Pilhyeon Pilhyeon closed this as completed Jan 4, 2021
@cccccccczy
Copy link
Author

I'm sorry.
I found that the link to the pre-trained model was wrong, which is corrected now.
Please update the model file and re-evaluate the model.
Thanks!

Thank you so much, the latest model is right. By the way could you please also have a look of your latest code? I can't achieve the reported results using your code, and my results very similar to the results above(the wrong model) so I doubt that maybe the code is also not the latest version. Thanks :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants