[Components] Certifier

[mariczne]

WHY

Resolves #12426

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced "Issue Credential" action to create, issue, and send credentials using the Certifier service.
• Enhancements
  • Added new methods for API interactions and credential management in the Certifier app module, enhancing the overall functionality and integration capabilities.
• Dependencies
  • Added @pipedream/platform as a new dependency to support the new features and enhancements.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Jun 20, 2024 8:00am

[vercel]

@mariczne is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[pipedream-component-development]

Thank you so much for submitting this! We've added it to our backlog to review, and our team has been notified.

[pipedream-component-development]

Thanks for submitting this PR! When we review PRs, we follow the Pipedream component guidelines. If you're not familiar, here's a quick checklist:

• Create components to address specific use cases whenever possible
• Component keys should follow the format app_name_slug-slugified-component-name
• Components should follow the standard directory structure
• Prefer Node.js client libraries to REST APIs
• When making API requests, handle pagination to ensure all data / events are processed
• Use secret props to capture sensitive data
• Props and methods should be defined in app files whenever possible
• Document methods with JS Docs
• Use optional props whenever possible, and set a default value where you can
• Use async options to accept user input wherever possible

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The Certifier component has been significantly enhanced, introducing a new action for issuing and sending credentials. The changes include various additions to the core certifier.app.mjs and a new dependency in package.json. Primarily, the action manages credential creation, issuance, and delivery, utilizing the Certifier API.

Changes

File	Change Summary
components/certifier/actions/...	Added issue-credential.mjs, defining a new action for creating, issuing, and sending credentials via the Certifier service.
components/certifier/certifier.app.mjs	Enhanced with new methods for Certifier API interactions, such as callApi, searchGroups, createCredential, issueCredential, and sendCredential.
components/certifier/package.json	Added @pipedream/platform to dependencies and updated publishConfig access settings.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant IssueAction
    participant CertifierApp
    participant CertifierAPI

    User->>IssueAction: Initiate action
    IssueAction->>CertifierApp: Create Credential
    CertifierApp->>CertifierAPI: API call to create credential
    CertifierAPI-->>CertifierApp: Credential created
    CertifierApp->>CertifierAPI: API call to issue credential
    CertifierAPI-->>CertifierApp: Credential issued
    CertifierApp->>CertifierAPI: API call to send credential
    CertifierAPI-->>CertifierApp: Credential sent
    CertifierApp-->>IssueAction: Credential created, issued, and sent
    IssueAction-->>User: Success response

Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Define action to issue credential (#12426)	✅
Implement Certifier API interaction methods (#12426)	✅
Update dependencies (#12426)	✅

Poem

A credential now takes flight,
Through Certifier's digital might,
Sent with care, issued right,
To a recipient's sheer delight.
In code's embrace, it finds its height,
A journey made with lines so tight.
🐇✨🎓

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

components/certifier/README.md (1)

3-3: Consider revising the phrase "a variety of industries" to "multiple industries" for conciseness.

Tools

LanguageTool

[style] ~3-~3: The phrase “a variety of” may be wordy. To make your writing clearer, consider replacing it. (A_VARIETY_OF)
Context: ...efficiency, security, and compliance in a variety of industries. # Example Use Cases - **O...

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33ddb12 and d1f73e9.

Files selected for processing (4)

• components/certifier/README.md (1 hunks)
• components/certifier/actions/issue-credential/issue-credential.mjs (1 hunks)
• components/certifier/certifier.app.mjs (1 hunks)
• components/certifier/package.json (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• components/certifier/package.json

Additional context used

LanguageTool

components/certifier/README.md

[style] ~3-~3: The phrase “a variety of” may be wordy. To make your writing clearer, consider replacing it. (A_VARIETY_OF)
Context: ...efficiency, security, and compliance in a variety of industries. # Example Use Cases - **O...

Markdownlint

components/certifier/README.md

5-5: null (MD025, single-title, single-h1)
Multiple top-level headings in the same document

Biome

components/certifier/actions/issue-credential/issue-credential.mjs

[error] 64-64: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators. (lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)

Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.

Additional comments not posted (4)

components/certifier/README.md (1)

5-11: The example use cases are well-chosen and effectively illustrate the practical applications of the Certifier platform.

Tools

Markdownlint

5-5: null (MD025, single-title, single-h1)
Multiple top-level headings in the same document

components/certifier/actions/issue-credential/issue-credential.mjs (1)

76-132: The run method is well-implemented, handling various scenarios effectively and providing detailed logging for each step.

components/certifier/certifier.app.mjs (2)

8-60: The methods defined in the app are robust, utilizing consistent patterns for API interaction and default parameter handling.

---

62-123: The property definitions are comprehensive and user-friendly, providing clear descriptions and dynamically loaded options.

[michelle0927]

Thank you so much for your contribution! I left some comments about some small changes, such as including the $ variable. I tried to make the changes myself, but was denied permission for some reason. Let me know if you have any questions or need any help with the updates.

[mariczne]

Thank you for the review @michelle0927! I've incorporated the changes you requested, with one small difference mentioned in another comment.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

components/certifier/certifier.app.mjs (1)

27-58: Review the use of spread syntax in API calls to ensure all necessary parameters are correctly passed and no unnecessary data is included.

Consider adding explicit checks or validations for the parameters being spread to prevent potential bugs or security issues.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1f73e9 and 7a8253b.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

Files selected for processing (3)

• components/certifier/actions/issue-credential/issue-credential.mjs (1 hunks)
• components/certifier/certifier.app.mjs (1 hunks)
• components/certifier/package.json (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)

• components/certifier/actions/issue-credential/issue-credential.mjs
• components/certifier/package.json

Additional comments not posted (3)

components/certifier/certifier.app.mjs (3)

7-26: Ensure the callApi method handles all possible Axios errors.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for error handling related to Axios calls in the entire codebase.

# Test: Search for Axios error handling. Expect: Proper error handling implementations.
rg --type javascript "catch" --glob '*.*js'

---

62-122: Validate the use of async options in property definitions to ensure they handle all edge cases, such as network failures or empty responses.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of async options in property definitions.

# Test: Search for async property implementations. Expect: Proper implementations and error handling.
rg --type javascript "async" --glob '*.*js'

---

62-122: The property definitions include optional fields with default values. Ensure these defaults are documented and tested.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation and testing of default values in property definitions.

# Test: Search for documentation and tests related to default values. Expect: Comprehensive documentation and tests.
rg --type markdown "default" --glob '*.*md'

[michelle0927]

Thank you for making all those changes! I apologize, I forgot to mention one small thing. Could you update the version in the package.json file from "0.0.1" to "0.1.0"? After that, I think this will be ready for QA.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a8253b and c662014.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

Files selected for processing (1)

• components/certifier/package.json (2 hunks)

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• components/certifier/package.json

[vunguyenhung]

Hi everyone, all test cases are passed! Ready for release!

Test report
https://vunguyenhung.notion.site/Components-Certifier-12467-53958f2b9a0445799052469a76b9b50a