You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Do we need leaflet terms like leaflet size, leaflet length, leaflet area, leaflet arrangement, leaflet margin, and leaflet shape? It seems to me that using the "leaf" terms is not appropriate.
The follow leaflet traits have been added to TO:
TO:0001113
leaflet morphology trait
def: A cardinal organ part morphology trait (TO:0000754) which is a quality of a leaflet (PO:0020049).
TO:cooperl
is_a: TO:0000754 ! cardinal organ part morphology trait
TO:0001119- leaflet size
def: A leaflet morphology trait (TO:0001113) which is the size (PATO:0000117 ) of a leaflet (PO:0020049).
TO:0001115- leaflet length
def: A leaflet morphology trait (TO:0001113) which is the length (PATO:0000122 ) of a leaflet (PO:0020049).
xref: TO_GIT:216
'part of' some 'leaflet size'
TO:0001116- leaflet shape
def: A leaflet morphology trait (TO:0001113) which is the shape (PATO:0000052 ) of a leaflet (PO:0020049).
Do we need leaflet terms like leaflet size, leaflet length, leaflet area, leaflet arrangement, leaflet margin, and leaflet shape? It seems to me that using the "leaf" terms is not appropriate.
Reported by: maxglycine
Original Ticket: obo/plant-trait-ontology-to-requests/117
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: