Rerun particle_tracing notebooks due to high resource usage

[StanczakDominik]

I reran the particle tracing notebooks. Seems they somehow became un-pre-executed, and now they're slowing down the doc builds by a major factor. It's been causing intermittent doc build failures on main for a bit, now.

We might also have to disable the epub/pdf builds again because we might not actually be latex compatible - we'll see.

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to PlasmaPy! The project's future depends deeply on contributors like you, so we deeply appreciate it! 🌱 The following checklist will be used by the code reviewer to help guide the code review process.

• Overall
  • Does the PR do what it intends to do?
  • Except for very minor changes, is a changelog entry included and consistent with the changelog guide?
  • Are the continuous integration checks passing? (Most linter problems can be automagically fixed by commenting on this PR with pre-commit.ci autofix.)
• Code
  • Is new/updated code understandable and consistent with the coding guide?
  • Are there ways to greatly simplify the implementation?
  • Are there any large functions that should be split up into shorter functions?
• Tests
  • Are tests added/updated as required, and consistent with the testing guide?
  • Are the tests understandable?
  • Do the tests cover all important cases?
• Docs
  • Are docs added/updated as required, and consistent with the doc guide?
  • Are the docs understandable?
  • Do the docs show up correctly in the preview, including Jupyter notebooks?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 98.29% // Head: 98.31% // Increases project coverage by +0.01% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (6b5c66c) compared to base (f433966).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1933      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.29%   98.31%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          95       95              
  Lines        8409     8428      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         8266     8286      +20     
+ Misses        143      142       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
plasmapy/particles/_factory.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
plasmapy/particles/particle_class.py	98.72% <0.00%> (+0.16%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[namurphy]

Strange that they got un-pre-executed! In any case, LGTM, and thanks for doing this!

I haven't looked at the pdfs to tell how compatible they are with LaTeX, though that was a good point to bring up.

[StanczakDominik]

I think I forgot to re-execute them after the last PR that touched them, and that's that mystery solved 😅