New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adding badges #5
Conversation
Changes Unknown when pulling 9d1c658 on v1.0.1 into ** on master**. |
1 similar comment
Changes Unknown when pulling 9d1c658 on v1.0.1 into ** on master**. |
Changes Unknown when pulling 4901076 on v1.0.1 into ** on master**. |
Changes Unknown when pulling 29f3ac9 on v1.0.1 into ** on master**. |
@brozeph yeah, looks like the report interpretation is different with coveralls since the coverage is above 80% while running the tests. |
Looking into why the coveralls reports less % code coverage. Also will look into bumping up the coverage. |
@brozeph added test that bumped code coverage above 90% |
Changes Unknown when pulling 20bbfd9 on v1.0.1 into ** on master**. |
We'll need to get coverage up - I haven't looked closely, but perhaps it's a weird issue with how coveralls interprets the reports.
Additionally, note the missing dependencies that were required to get the build to work properly. These little details are killers (https://travis-ci.org/PlayNetwork/fs-promise-util/jobs/231622328#L420).