-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2.0 preview #103
2.0 preview #103
Conversation
8b97db1
to
d2fa1a4
Compare
d2fa1a4
to
184f0a9
Compare
So there's good news and bad news. 👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there. 😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that they're okay with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request. Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the |
2.0-preview updates to travis.yaml, bower.json, and more
bower.json
Outdated
}, | ||
"devDependencies": { | ||
"iron-component-page": "polymerelements/iron-component-page#^1.0.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is iron-component-page
ready to be used in 2.0-preview
branches?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yas, it needs to come back
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it came back
demo/index.html
Outdated
min-height: 20px; | ||
} | ||
|
||
.main-container { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There doesn't seem to be any element with the class main-container
here.
iron-flex-layout-classes.html
Outdated
@@ -66,12 +66,6 @@ | |||
flex-wrap: wrap; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
.layout.no-wrap { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this rule gone?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it got merged to master after this PR was started. Will rebase :)
@bicknellr done! 🎉 |
@@ -370,7 +370,6 @@ | |||
display: block; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/* IE 10 support for HTML5 hidden attr */ | |||
[hidden] { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we're dropping support for IE 10, can we remove this ruleset altogether?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think it's still useful -- remember, [hidden]
is a lie, and if you don't define this it will never be applied correctly once a display:xxx
has been set anywhere else
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other than this question about hidden
and the known Chrome 57 bug causing tests to fail, I think this looks good.
Uhhh since when are the tests red |
Remove nested comments affecting polylint and IE11
btw GUIDE.md has a lot of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
guide.md has quite a few @apply(...);
from polymer to Polymer in 2.0-preview
/deep/
files@apply
syntax