images: move referenced images to page bundles

bundle.sh

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 set -eu
 
-rg --files-with-matches --fixed-strings "(/images/" ./content/post | sort | while read -r file; do
+rg --files-with-matches --fixed-strings "/images/" ./content/post | sort | while read -r file; do
   echo "==> $file"
 
   dir_name=$(basename "$file" ".md")
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ rg --files-with-matches --fixed-strings "(/images/" ./content/post | sort | whil
   echo "    dir path: $dir_path"
   mkdir -p "$dir_path"
 
-  echo "    inline references"
+  echo "    inline images"
 
   rg --only-matching "\(/images/.*\)" --no-line-number "$file" | tr -d "()" | uniq | while read -r image_path; do
     echo "    - $image_path"
@@ -25,6 +25,19 @@ rg --files-with-matches --fixed-strings "(/images/" ./content/post | sort | whil
 
   done
 
+  echo "    referenced images"
+  rg --only-matching "]: /images/.*" --no-line-number "$file" | sed -n 's/]: \(.*\)/\1/p' | uniq | while read -r image_path; do
+    echo "    - $image_path"
+
+    image_name=$(basename "$image_path")
+
+    echo "    - $image_name"
+
+    mv "./static$image_path" "$dir_path" || true
+    sed -i "s,]: $image_path,]: $image_name,g" "$file"
+
+  done
+
 
   echo "    move file"
   mv "$file" "$dir_path/index.md"

content/post/2009-12-16-thanks-google-for-solving-my-problem.md → content/post/2009-12-16-thanks-google-for-solving-my-problem/index.md

@@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ The moral of the story?  If in doubt, copy Google.
 [1]: /functionality-and-seperation-of-concerns
 [2]: http://quince.infragistics.com
 [3]: http://www.welie.com
-[4]: /images/gmail-selection.jpg
+[4]: gmail-selection.jpg

content/post/2010-01-12-converting-from-nunit-to-mstest.md → content/post/2010-01-12-converting-from-nunit-to-mstest/index.md

@@ -64,4 +64,4 @@ AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetData("APPBASE", currDir);
 Hope that helps everyone who has to do this kind of conversion.
 
 [1]: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/vststest/thread/433e4860-b61f-44fd-bef9-a569fb32d244
-[2]: /images/unblock-file.jpg
+[2]: unblock-file.jpg

content/post/2011-10-22-noticing-changes.md → content/post/2011-10-22-noticing-changes/index.md

@@ -17,4 +17,4 @@ Now while I have no problem in making the change, I do however wonder what cause
 
 Another thing is that while it is a very minor change, it must have been causing user friction for the last 6 years or so, and no one has mentioned it?  Maybe they just didn't think it was changeable, or that it just wasn't that bothersome compared to some other issue they had?
 
-[1]: /images/form-validation.jpg
+[1]: form-validation.jpg

content/post/2012-01-26-model-view-presenter-introduction.md → content/post/2012-01-26-model-view-presenter-introduction/index.md

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ The Model is the data to be displayed.  This can either be an abstraction that e
 [2]: http://codebetter.com/jeremymiller/2007/07/26/the-build-your-own-cab-series-table-of-contents/
 [3]: http://martinfowler.com/eaaDev/PassiveScreen.html
 [4]: http://martinfowler.com/eaaDev/SupervisingPresenter.html
-[5]: /images/mvp-diagram.jpg
+[5]: mvp-diagram.jpg
 [6]: /model-view-presenters-presenter-to-view-communication
 [7]: /model-view-presenters-view-to-presenter-communication
 [8]: /model-view-presenters-composite-views

content/post/2012-03-29-model-view-presenters-composite-views.md → content/post/2012-03-29-model-view-presenters-composite-views/index.md

@@ -171,4 +171,4 @@ Out of the three methods outlined, Method 2 is my personal preference, especiall
 [1]: /model-view-presenter-introduction
 [2]: /model-view-presenters-presenter-to-view-communication
 [3]: /model-view-presenters-view-to-presenter-communication
-[4]: /images/mvp-sub-view-diagram.jpg
+[4]: mvp-sub-view-diagram.jpg

content/post/2012-10-29-winforms-design-time-support-exposing-sub-designers.md → content/post/2012-10-29-winforms-design-time-support-exposing-sub-designers/index.md

@@ -60,6 +60,6 @@ As you can see, the two control's ToolStrips contents is unique, and we have the
 
 
 [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.usercontrol.aspx
-[2]: /images/sub-designer-control.png
+[2]: sub-designer-control.png
 [3]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.design.controldesigner.aspx
-[4]: /images/sub-designer-designtime.png
+[4]: sub-designer-designtime.png

content/post/2014-02-02-specialising-a-general-application.md → content/post/2014-02-02-specialising-a-general-application/index.md

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ If this was a web application, you could even make it work out which UI to displ
 Mockups were made using [Moqups.com][mocking-tool]
 Names generated with [Behind THe Name][name-gen]
 
-[ui-sales]: /images/specialised-sales.png
-[ui-legal]: /images/specialised-legal.png
+[ui-sales]: specialised-sales.png
+[ui-legal]: specialised-legal.png
 [name-gen]: http://www.behindthename.com/random/
 [mocking-tool]: https://moqups.com/

content/post/2015-08-30-single-project-service-and-console.md → content/post/2015-08-30-single-project-service-and-console/index.md

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ My only solution to this is: **Don't tick that box**. I don't think I have ever
 
 Using this method means less code and projects to maintain, and a very easy path to go from running a service as a desktop application to service.
 
-[vs-new-project]: /images/service-new.png
-[vs-project-type]: /images/service-project-type.png
-[service-logon]: /images/service-interact.png
+[vs-new-project]: service-new.png
+[vs-project-type]: service-project-type.png
+[service-logon]: service-interact.png
 [serilog]: http://serilog.net/