Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Stickiness with compare is buggy #3124

Closed
2 tasks
EDsCODE opened this issue Jan 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed
2 tasks

Stickiness with compare is buggy #3124

EDsCODE opened this issue Jan 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@EDsCODE
Labels
bug Something isn't working right P0 Critical, breaking issue (page crash, missing functionality)

Comments

@EDsCODE
Copy link
Member

EDsCODE commented Jan 28, 2021

Bug description

Please describe.

  • Using compare option with stickiness gives a really buggy graph. The numbers don't seem to make sense and clicking on datapoints don't give you people

Expected behavior

  • should work

How to reproduce

  1. Go to stickiness insight
  2. click compare (it crashes right now)

Environment

  • PostHog Cloud
  • self-hosted PostHog, version/commit: please provide

Additional context

Thank you for your bug report – we love squashing them!
@EDsCODE EDsCODE added the bug Something isn't working right label Jan 28, 2021
@EDsCODE EDsCODE self-assigned this Jan 28, 2021
@EDsCODE EDsCODE mentioned this issue Jan 28, 2021
Closed
21 tasks
@EDsCODE EDsCODE added the P0 Critical, breaking issue (page crash, missing functionality) label Feb 4, 2021
@macobo
Copy link
Contributor

macobo commented Feb 8, 2021

Will #3195 fix this? Mind verifying + sending a link to a broken graph if it does not.

@macobo macobo closed this as completed Feb 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@EDsCODE EDsCODE

Labels
bug Something isn't working right P0 Critical, breaking issue (page crash, missing functionality)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@macobo @EDsCODE