Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rec: Backport #13102 to rec-4.9.x: Do not assume the records are in a particular order when deterining if an answer is NODATA #13176

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 28, 2023
Merged

rec: Backport #13102 to rec-4.9.x: Do not assume the records are in a particular order when deterining if an answer is NODATA #13176

merged 1 commit into from Aug 28, 2023

Conversation

omoerbeek
Copy link
Member

(cherry picked from commit fa5f61e)

Backport of #13102

Short description

Checklist

I have:

  • read the CONTRIBUTING.md document
  • compiled this code
  • tested this code
  • included documentation (including possible behaviour changes)
  • documented the code
  • added or modified regression test(s)
  • added or modified unit test(s)
  • checked that this code was merged to master

@omoerbeek
rec: Do not assume the records are in a particular order when determi…
f3e8918 
…ning if an answer is

NODATA.

(cherry picked from commit fa5f61e)
@omoerbeek omoerbeek added this to the rec-4.9.x milestone Aug 25, 2023
@omoerbeek omoerbeek merged commit 59a2239 into PowerDNS:rel/rec-4.9.x Aug 28, 2023
42 checks passed
@omoerbeek omoerbeek deleted the backport-13102-to-rec-4.9.x branch August 28, 2023 08:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@rgacogne rgacogne rgacogne approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
defect rec
Projects
None yet
Milestone
rec-4.9.x
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@omoerbeek @rgacogne