Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

preInstallConsul job fails with Read-only file system #42

Closed
Chrislevi opened this issue Jul 19, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #43
Closed

preInstallConsul job fails with Read-only file system #42

Chrislevi opened this issue Jul 19, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #43

Comments

@Chrislevi
Copy link
Contributor

Chrislevi commented Jul 19, 2018

kubectl version:
Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"9", GitVersion:"v1.9.6", GitCommit:"9f8ebd171479bec0ada837d7ee641dec2f8c6dd1", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2018-03-21T15:13:31Z", GoVersion:"go1.9.3", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}

when I run helm install --name vault --namespace vault helm_charts/vault it prints Error: timed out waiting for the condition due to preInstallConsul job failure.
I extended the JobDeadline but it didn't help obviously.

seems like the preInstallConsul cant manage to run command chmod -R +x /pre-install
job's log:
chmod: /pre-install: Read-only file system

job's mound description:
Mounts:
/etc/podinfo from podinfo (ro)
/pre-install from pre-install (rw)

Any ideas?
Thanks for the help.

@Chrislevi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bartlettc22 Any help?

@Chrislevi Chrislevi changed the title helm install timed out waiting for the condition preInstallConsul job fails with Read-only file system Jul 22, 2018
@Chrislevi
Copy link
Contributor Author

kubernetes/kubernetes#58720
I assume the job flow worked, this PR could be related?

@idcmp
Copy link

idcmp commented Jul 23, 2018

Same problem here. Sadly, makes this project unusable until it's resolved.

@Chrislevi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@idcmp I've forked the project and fixed the problem, there's an open PR for the fix, its pretty simple to implement by yourself. -> #43

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants