Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix use of protocol #11678

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 10, 2018
Merged

Fix use of protocol #11678

merged 3 commits into from Dec 10, 2018

Conversation

MathiasReker
Copy link
Contributor

@MathiasReker MathiasReker commented Dec 9, 2018

Questions Answers
Branch? develop
Description? Protocol should not be hardcoded.
Type? improvement
Category? CO
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Fixed ticket? /
How to test? /

This change is Reviewable

@prestonBot prestonBot added develop Branch Improvement Type: Improvement labels Dec 9, 2018
@mickaelandrieu
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MathiasReker,

how can we test this? I'm pretty sure it fixes a bug on shops powered by HTTPS but I'd like a reproducible test case so the QA team can validate it.

Mickaël

@mickaelandrieu mickaelandrieu added the Waiting for author Status: action required, waiting for author feedback label Dec 10, 2018
@MathiasReker
Copy link
Contributor Author

MathiasReker commented Dec 10, 2018

@mickaelandrieu I agree with you. Sorry, this was done from a theocratic point of view. I can not add a reproduce case for this. I am not sure exactly where to check this. It should be image path of some PDF stuff and some cronjobs. I am not 100% sure.

@mickaelandrieu
Copy link
Contributor

I'll ask another approval from @PrestaShop/prestashop-core-developers then 👍

@PierreRambaud PierreRambaud removed the Waiting for author Status: action required, waiting for author feedback label Dec 10, 2018
@mickaelandrieu mickaelandrieu merged commit 6ef4baf into PrestaShop:develop Dec 10, 2018
@mickaelandrieu mickaelandrieu added this to the 1.7.6.0 milestone Dec 10, 2018
@mickaelandrieu
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks everyone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
develop Branch Improvement Type: Improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants