Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update classname regex to allow FQDN #33771

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 7, 2023

Conversation

gross-nvs
Copy link
Contributor

@gross-nvs gross-nvs commented Aug 30, 2023

Questions Answers
Branch? 8.1.x
Description? Fix classname validation in Validate not allowing FQDN classnames
Type? bug fix
Category? BO
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
How to test? Install the following test module, then click on 'Configure' to trigger the test case. If no error message is displayed and a log line is properly added to the log list (Advances parameters > Logs) then the fix works. test_33590.zip
Fixed issue or discussion? Fixes #33590
Related PRs
Sponsor company Novius

@gross-nvs gross-nvs requested a review from a team as a code owner August 30, 2023 12:14
@prestonBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @gross-nvs!

This is your first pull request on the PrestaShop project. Thank you, and welcome to this Open Source community!

@prestonBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, thanks for this contribution!

I found some issues with the Pull Request description:

  • Your pull request does not seem to fix any issue, consider creating one (see note below) and linking it by writing Fixes #1234.

Would you mind having a look at it? This will help us understand how interesting your contribution is, thank you very much!

About linked issues

Please consider opening an issue before submitting a Pull Request:

  • If it's a bug fix, it helps maintainers verify that the bug is effectively due to a defect in the code, and that it hasn't been fixed already.
  • It can help trigger a discussion about the best implementation path before a single line of code is written.
  • It may lead the Core Product team to mark that issue as a priority, further attracting the maintainers' attention.

(Note: this is an automated message, but answering it will reach a real human)

Copy link
Contributor

@matthieu-rolland matthieu-rolland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Contributor

@kpodemski kpodemski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you target 8.1.x branch?

@ps-jarvis ps-jarvis added the Waiting for author Status: action required, waiting for author feedback label Aug 30, 2023
@kpodemski kpodemski removed the Waiting for author Status: action required, waiting for author feedback label Aug 30, 2023
@boherm boherm added this to the 8.1.2 milestone Aug 31, 2023
@MatShir MatShir added the Waiting for QA Status: action required, waiting for test feedback label Sep 4, 2023
@kpodemski kpodemski closed this Sep 4, 2023
@kpodemski kpodemski reopened this Sep 4, 2023
@kpodemski
Copy link
Contributor

@PrestaShop/qa-functional I restarted the tests but feel free to test the PR anyway, I'm positive they'll be green ;-)

@kpodemski kpodemski closed this Sep 4, 2023
@kpodemski kpodemski reopened this Sep 4, 2023
@paulnoelcholot
Copy link

@kpodemski They are not green ^^ Someone, but not all ;p

@paulnoelcholot
Copy link

Hello @gross-nvs,

Some checks were not successful, can you look into that? :)

Thanks!

@gross-nvs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @paulnoelcholot

By looking the details, I'm afraid I'm not qualified to fix those problems, nor are they related to the code change.

@kpodemski
Copy link
Contributor

kpodemski commented Sep 5, 2023

@gross-nvs no worries, it's the issue on our side - or rather a GH side :D

@kpodemski kpodemski closed this Sep 5, 2023
@kpodemski kpodemski reopened this Sep 5, 2023
@MhiriFaten MhiriFaten self-assigned this Sep 6, 2023
Copy link

@MhiriFaten MhiriFaten left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @gross-nvs ,

I have checked the PR, no error message is displayed and a log line is properly added to the log list.
But I noticed that the autolated tests failed in test (functional:productV2, 8.1.x)

@PrestaShop/qa-automation is this failure related to the PR ?

@prestonBot prestonBot added the 8.1.x Branch label Sep 7, 2023
@MhiriFaten MhiriFaten added QA ✔️ Status: check done, code approved and removed Waiting for QA Status: action required, waiting for test feedback labels Sep 7, 2023
@nicosomb nicosomb merged commit 27fc5e0 into PrestaShop:8.1.x Sep 7, 2023
114 of 170 checks passed
@nicosomb
Copy link
Contributor

nicosomb commented Sep 7, 2023

Thank you @gross-nvs !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
8.1.x Branch Bug fix Type: Bug fix QA ✔️ Status: check done, code approved
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Since 8.1, using namespace with ObjectModel will throw a PrestaShopLogger issue
10 participants