Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add some chance of randomness to hawk/dove game #45

Closed
rlskoeser opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

add some chance of randomness to hawk/dove game #45

rlskoeser opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Robustness hoping things stay the same but confirming that results don’t rely on specifics of set up

Comments

@rlskoeser
Copy link
Contributor

rlskoeser commented Nov 7, 2023

e.g., each agent has a 0.01 chance of just playing DOVE and a 0.01 chance of just playing HAWK rather than using our standard procedure to determine what he plays

slider with how much chance that you get a random play: 0 to 1 (1 = totally random behavior, 0 no randomness; c/2 chance of dove, c/2 chance of hawk, 1-c follow the strategy)

@rlskoeser rlskoeser changed the title add some randomness to hawk/dove game add some chance of randomness to hawk/dove game Nov 7, 2023
@rlskoeser rlskoeser added the Robustness hoping things stay the same but confirming that results don’t rely on specifics of set up label Dec 14, 2023
@rlskoeser rlskoeser self-assigned this Dec 19, 2023
rlskoeser added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2023
Add parameter for chance of random hawk/dove play #45
@rlskoeser rlskoeser added the 🗜️ awaiting testing Implemented and ready to be tested label Dec 20, 2023
@rlskoeser rlskoeser removed the 🗜️ awaiting testing Implemented and ready to be tested label Jan 22, 2024
rlskoeser added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2024
Add parameter for chance of random hawk/dove play #45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Robustness hoping things stay the same but confirming that results don’t rely on specifics of set up
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants