1.9 support

[rom1504]

We plan to support 1.9 once we get 1.9 chunk support (see PrismarineJS/prismarine-chunk#19)
Duplicate issues :

• 1.9.2 Ping timeout on connect #417
• 1.9.2 chunk loading issue #434
• Bot getting kicked for outdated client? #443
• Error AssertionError #448

[ooxi]

Is somebody actively working on this? I'm currently trying to a proof of concept working and it would be sad to redo the work somebody else already did :)

[roblabla]

Lots of work has gone into this in various fork, but nothing was ever finalized. The biggest problem was handling chunks is a real pain now. Having a version of https://github.com/PrismarineJS/prismarine-chunk that works on 1.9 would go a long way to making mineflayer working on 1.9.

[ooxi]

I don't quite get how prismarine-chunk relates to mineflayer? I see package.json lists prismarine-chunk as a dependency but nowhere inside the mineflayer source I see a require('prismarine-chunk') (besides the tests).

[rom1504]

Mineflayer currently use its own 1.8 chunk implementation. We need a 1.9 chunk implementation to update it. It makes more sense to implement that independently from mineflayer which is why it has been started in prismarine-chunk.

…

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016, 23:43 ooxi ***@***.***> wrote: I don't quite get how prismarine-chunk relates to mineflayer? I see package.json lists prismarine-chunk as a dependency but nowhere inside the mineflayer source I see a require('prismarine-chunk') (besides the tests). — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#449 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACPN_qrZ1Mt-tfzrIGDX7uXEy3eX9Nxjks5rHHyBgaJpZM4J6YE1> .

[rom1504]

done