Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FOUR-13017 | The Toggles for ‘Available Processes’ and ‘Add From Templates’ Should Change When B-Collapse Opens and Closes #5891

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

mcraeteisha
Copy link
Contributor

@mcraeteisha mcraeteisha commented Jan 2, 2024

Issue

Ticket: FOUR-13017

When the b-collapse for 'Available Processes' and 'Add from Templates' are selected, the toggles do not change.

Solution

Update toggle functionality so that when a b-collapse is opened or closed, the toggle reflects the action.

How to Test

  1. Go to branch observation/FOUR-13017 in processmaker.
  2. Go to Processes → Guided Templates.
  3. Select the 'Available Processes' option to open/close the b-collapse dropdown.
    • The toggle should change to reflect the b-collapse opening and closing.
  4. Select the 'Add from Templates' option to open/close the b-collapse dropdown.
    • The toggle should change to reflect the b-collapse opening and closing.

ci:next

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@eiresendez eiresendez self-requested a review January 3, 2024 15:31
eiresendez

This comment was marked as resolved.

@eiresendez eiresendez self-requested a review January 5, 2024 17:47
Copy link

@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit a8b2976 into next Jan 5, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants