Information within the documentation

[DarrenPIngram]

It would be good if you could explain (within the project's documentation) how this application may be similar/comparable to Jackett and, of course, highlight the existing and planned differences that will make the application stand out. Jackett is already well-established and by doing the foregoing it may help the project gain additional traction and usage.

[Roxedus]

The FAQ has some of these points already covered, so that would be a good place to base that on.

[DarrenPIngram]

Indeed, but it is hardly "snappy" and, to be frank, I don't expect most people who learn about the application/stumble across it will necessarily look inside the deep FAQ until they are suitably curious about the application to install it and learn more about it/fix issues. So some snappier text in the project's home page on the lines that I outlined may be beneficial, I humbly submit. ‌

…

On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 11:17, Roxedus ***@***.***> wrote: The FAQ <https://wiki.servarr.com/Prowlarr_FAQ> has some of these points already covered, so that would be a good place to base that on. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#83 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABV5MACMGPU24MJTKOVTAATTQNAX5ANCNFSM452MWJTQ> .

[Qstick]

To @Roxedus point we could likely pull some of that language or points from the FAQ to use in a more upfront way on the page. We do have plans to expand on the current page and documentation, just not a top priority. That being said we’d welcome a PR with some recommendations should you feel up to it.

[DarrenPIngram]

As things become a little more fixed and ready that could be a possibility. ‌

…

On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 23:12, Qstick ***@***.***> wrote: To @Roxedus <https://github.com/Roxedus> point we could likely pull some of that language or points from the FAQ to use in a more upfront way on the page. We do have plans to expand on the current page and documentation, just not a top priority. That being said we’d welcome a PR with some recommendations should you feel up to it. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#83 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABV5MAAOOVKSXNJBAQMFKJTTQPUR7ANCNFSM452MWJTQ> .