Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run pyflakes against all code in the virtualenv #69

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jayvdb
Copy link
Member

@jayvdb jayvdb commented May 7, 2016

No description provided.

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member Author

jayvdb commented May 7, 2016

Here is what it looks like after #61 is merged: https://travis-ci.org/jayvdb/pyflakes/builds/128447040

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member Author

jayvdb commented May 7, 2016

Note that complete log is nicely 'folded'/hidden on Python 3.5+ as it has less flakes and thus fits within the allowed size for the log in the Travis web UI.

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member Author

jayvdb commented Jul 5, 2016

just rebased.

@sigmavirus24
Copy link
Member

Can you explain why this is necessary? I feel like this is going to add a lot of noise in the travis logs.

@bitglue
Copy link
Member

bitglue commented Jul 5, 2016

The answer to the "why" question should probably go in the commit log message for posterity

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member Author

jayvdb commented Jul 5, 2016

It would have blocked both of the regressions that occurred in 1.2 .

@sigmavirus24
Copy link
Member

@bitglue is correct. The why for this should be in the commit log and the file should have a comment telling people this is meant to prevent regressions that will only be caught on Travis (not locally). That comment will ideally cause people to look at the commit log and see your reasoning for this.

@asottile
Copy link
Member

I'm planning to make an actual framework for tracking differences which would obsolete this

@asottile asottile closed this Nov 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants