Different output with --jobs=1 and --jobs=2 #374

pylint-bot · 2014-11-12T03:43:59Z

Originally reported by: Robert Spier (BitBucket: robert_spier)

Parallelism (--jobs) changes the output of pylint.

It's not just the order of the tests, --jobs=2 outputs 18468 lines of output compared to only 21 for --jobs=1. pylint 1.3.1 reports no lint errors.

$ venv/bin/pylint --jobs=2 --rcfile=$PWD/pylintrc app/codein app/melange app/soc app/summerofcode app/settings.py app/urls.py app/main.py tests pavement.py setup.py 2>&1 | head
************* Module codein.callback
W: 17, 0: import missing from __future__ import absolute_import (no-absolute-import)
W: 18, 0: import missing from __future__ import absolute_import (no-absolute-import)
W: 19, 0: import missing from __future__ import absolute_import (no-absolute-import)
W: 20, 0: import missing from __future__ import absolute_import (no-absolute-import)
************* Module codein.types
W: 17, 0: import missing from __future__ import absolute_import (no-absolute-import)
W: 18, 0: import missing from __future__ import absolute_import (no-absolute-import)
W: 20, 0: import missing from __future__ import absolute_import (no-absolute-import)
W: 21, 0: import missing from __future__ import absolute_import (no-absolute-import)

$ venv/bin/pylint --jobs=1 --rcfile=$PWD/pylintrc app/codein app/melange app/soc app/summerofcode app/settings.py app/urls.py app/main.py tests pavement.py setup.py 2>&1 | head
************* Module main
E: 46, 2: print statement used (print-statement)
E: 47, 2: print statement used (print-statement)
E: 48, 2: print statement used (print-statement)
E: 49, 2: print statement used (print-statement)
E: 50, 2: print statement used (print-statement)
************* Module tests.test_utils
E:658, 8: print statement used (print-statement)
E:662,10: print statement used (print-statement)
E:667, 8: print statement used (print-statement)

This is with the current head of the pylint repository. (1889:e404dd4d6e37 tip)

The source code being linted is https://code.google.com/p/soc/

Bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/374

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

pylint-bot · 2014-11-12T02:49:04Z

Original comment by Robert Spier (BitBucket: robert_spier):

And here's the output with formatting fixed.

$ venv/bin/pylint --jobs=2 --rcfile=$PWD/pylintrc app/codein app/melange app/soc app/summerofcode app/settings.py app/urls.py app/main.py tests pavement.py setup.py 2>&1 | head

#!text

************* Module codein.callback
W: 17, 0: import missing `from __future__ import absolute_import` (no-absolute-import)
W: 18, 0: import missing `from __future__ import absolute_import` (no-absolute-import)
W: 19, 0: import missing `from __future__ import absolute_import` (no-absolute-import)
W: 20, 0: import missing `from __future__ import absolute_import` (no-absolute-import)
************* Module codein.types
W: 17, 0: import missing `from __future__ import absolute_import` (no-absolute-import)
W: 18, 0: import missing `from __future__ import absolute_import` (no-absolute-import)
W: 20, 0: import missing `from __future__ import absolute_import` (no-absolute-import)
W: 21, 0: import missing `from __future__ import absolute_import` (no-absolute-import)

$ venv/bin/pylint --jobs=1 --rcfile=$PWD/pylintrc app/codein app/melange app/soc app/summerofcode app/settings.py app/urls.py app/main.py tests pavement.py setup.py 2>&1 | head

#!text

************* Module main
E: 46, 2: print statement used (print-statement)
E: 47, 2: print statement used (print-statement)
E: 48, 2: print statement used (print-statement)
E: 49, 2: print statement used (print-statement)
E: 50, 2: print statement used (print-statement)
************* Module tests.test_utils
E:658, 8: print statement used (print-statement)
E:662,10: print statement used (print-statement)
E:667, 8: print statement used (print-statement)
************* Module tests.run
E:471, 4: print statement used (print-statement)
E:473, 4: print statement used (print-statement)

pylint-bot · 2014-11-24T21:05:22Z

Original comment by Robert Spier (BitBucket: robert_spier):

FYI, I can also replicate this with the official 1.4.0 release. Although the output is slightly different. Running with --jobs=2 produces many more lint warnings than with --jobs=1.

pylint-bot · 2014-12-09T07:50:47Z

Original comment by Saulius Menkevičius (BitBucket: sauliusmenkevicius):

Can confirm.

For me, pylint seems to ignore the pylintrc file, even though it is specified via the --rcfile= option, when -j 2+ is set.

I was using an older version of pylint (with support for --jobs) from hg+http://bitbucket.org/godfryd/pylint/@763d12c3c923f0733fc5c1866c69d973475993cd#egg=pylint from this PR: https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/pull-request/82/added-support-for-checking-files-in/commits; which seemed to respect --pylintrc properly in multi-process mode. Something broke inbetween that checkin and 1.4.0

pylint-bot · 2014-12-09T23:02:47Z

Original comment by Pedro Algarvio (BitBucket: s0undt3ch, GitHub: @s0undt3ch?):

I can also confirm this. I had custom plugins on the rcfile and they're not being loaded

pylint-bot · 2014-12-09T23:02:57Z

Original comment by Pedro Algarvio (BitBucket: s0undt3ch, GitHub: @s0undt3ch?):

I'm also on 1.4.0

pylint-bot · 2014-12-11T21:01:45Z

Original comment by Claudiu Popa (BitBucket: PCManticore, GitHub: @PCManticore):

Yeah, --jobs is kind tricky right now, will try to fix asap. By the way, if you have any other problems with --jobs, it's better to open another ticket, so they could be tracked and fixed individually.

pylint-bot · 2014-12-11T21:11:12Z

Original comment by Pedro Algarvio (BitBucket: s0undt3ch, GitHub: @s0undt3ch?):

I believe my problem is because the rcfile is being ignored.

pylint-bot · 2015-01-07T06:01:00Z

Original comment by Michal Nowikowski (BitBucket: godfryd, GitHub: @godfryd?):

The issue has been fixed by pull request #213.

pylint-bot · 2015-01-14T21:05:41Z

Original comment by Claudiu Popa (BitBucket: PCManticore, GitHub: @PCManticore):

Merged in godfryd/pylint/fix-374 (pull request #213)

Fixed passing configuration from master linter to sublinters. Closes issue #374.

pylint-bot · 2015-01-14T21:05:42Z

Original comment by Claudiu Popa (BitBucket: PCManticore, GitHub: @PCManticore):

Merged in godfryd/pylint/fix-374 (pull request #213)

Fixed passing configuration from master linter to sublinters. Closes issue #374.

pylint-bot · 2015-01-14T21:05:42Z

Original comment by Claudiu Popa (BitBucket: PCManticore, GitHub: @PCManticore):

Fixed passing configuration from master linter to sublinters. Closes issue #374.

pylint-bot · 2015-01-14T22:07:48Z

Original comment by Claudiu Popa (BitBucket: PCManticore, GitHub: @PCManticore):

Hm, the latest patch introduced another regression related to disabling messages from the pylintrc.

pylint-bot · 2015-01-15T04:47:40Z

Original comment by Michal Nowikowski (BitBucket: godfryd, GitHub: @godfryd?):

How to reproduce that new problem?

I run:

pylint --jobs=2 --rcfile=pylintrc app/codein app/melange app/soc app/summerofcode app/settings.py app/urls.py app/main.py tests pavement.py setup.py
pylint --jobs=1 --rcfile=pylintrc app/codein app/melange app/soc app/summerofcode app/settings.py app/urls.py app/main.py tests pavement.py setup.py

The outputs contain the same messages. pylintrc is disabling and enabling particular messages.

pylint-bot · 2015-01-15T09:18:27Z

Original comment by Claudiu Popa (BitBucket: PCManticore, GitHub: @PCManticore):

Indeed, it was due to a faulty installation. Sorry about the noise.

pylint-bot · 2015-01-16T21:23:29Z

Original comment by Robert Spier (BitBucket: robert_spier):

I confirm that it works correctly on the Melange codebase. The performance improvement from adding more jobs is not as high as expected.

pylint-bot · 2015-02-25T23:47:32Z

Original comment by Pavel Roskin (BitBucket: pavel_roskin):

The issue with absolute_import may be resolved by pull request #229. The performance is discussed in issue #479. There are still issues with different output. Not sure if I should open another ticket. I'll describe it here.

pylint-bot · 2015-02-25T23:55:16Z

Original comment by Pavel Roskin (BitBucket: pavel_roskin):

That's a minimal example showing that the issue is not fully resolved.

#!shell

echo 'pass' > first.py
echo 'pass' > second.py
pylint first.py second.py >output1
pylint --jobs=2 first.py second.py >output2
diff -u output1 output2

#!diff

--- output1 2015-02-25 18:51:36.770036133 -0500
+++ output2 2015-02-25 18:51:39.274040857 -0500
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@

 Report
 ======
-3 statements analysed.
+4 statements analysed.

 Statistics by type
 ------------------
@@ -72,31 +72,18 @@



-% errors / warnings by module
------------------------------
-
-+-------+------+--------+---------+-----------+
-|module |error |warning |refactor |convention |
-+=======+======+========+=========+===========+
-|second |0.00  |0.00    |0.00     |50.00      |
-+-------+------+--------+---------+-----------+
-|first  |0.00  |0.00    |0.00     |50.00      |
-+-------+------+--------+---------+-----------+
-
-
-
 Messages
 --------

 +------------------+------------+
 |message id        |occurrences |
 +==================+============+
-|missing-docstring |2           |
+|missing-docstring |1           |
 +------------------+------------+



 Global evaluation
 -----------------
-Your code has been rated at 3.33/10 (previous run: 3.33/10, +0.00)
+Your code has been rated at 5.00/10 (previous run: 3.33/10, +1.67)

pylint-bot · 2015-09-16T16:28:48Z

Original comment by James Broadhead (BitBucket: jamesbroadhead, GitHub: @jamesbroadhead?):

Same here -- getting significantly more 'duplicate-code' & 'cyclic-import' with --jobs=1 over --jobs=2

Closed-source codebase, but I'm happy to run debug branches etc. over it.

$ pylint --version
pylint 1.4.4,
astroid 1.3.6, common 1.0.2
Python 2.7.8 (default, Sep 10 2014, 04:44:11)
[GCC 4.9.1]

pylint-bot · 2015-09-29T21:06:47Z

Original comment by Claudiu Popa (BitBucket: PCManticore, GitHub: @PCManticore):

Increasing to blocker, so that we'll have a fix finally in 1.5.

pylint-bot · 2015-10-19T18:22:46Z

Original comment by Claudiu Popa (BitBucket: PCManticore, GitHub: @PCManticore):

I'm trying to reproduce this issue, but unfortunately I can't reproduce Pavel's example using the latest code from the repository. Could anyone of you provide a more comprehensive example where this discrepancy happens?

pylint-bot · 2015-10-24T05:30:01Z

Original comment by Pavel Roskin (BitBucket: pavel_roskin):

I tried pylint on the current python-ly, and I see that things have improved greatly. There are only two issues that the parallel pylint missed compared to the single-job version: R0401(cyclic-import) and R0801(duplicate-code). There is also a discrepancy in the way __init__.py is referred to.

One job:

************* Module ly
ly/__init__.py(46): [C0303(trailing-whitespace)] Trailing whitespace

Two jobs:

************* Module ly.__init__
ly/__init__.py(46): [C0303(trailing-whitespace)] Trailing whitespace

I actually prefer the later notation, it's more explicit that it's just the __init__.py file, not the whole module.

pylint-bot · 2015-10-24T05:44:06Z

Original comment by Pavel Roskin (BitBucket: pavel_roskin):

Here's a simple test for the module naming issue. It turns out the parallel version uses both names, which is bad.

[proski@dell pylinttest]$ echo "pass " >__init__.py
[proski@dell pylinttest]$ pylint -r n --jobs=1 .
************* Module pylinttest
C:  1, 0: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
C:  1, 0: Missing module docstring (missing-docstring)
[proski@dell pylinttest]$ pylint -r n --jobs=2 .
************* Module pylinttest.__init__
C:  1, 0: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
************* Module pylinttest
C:  1, 0: Missing module docstring (missing-docstring)

pylint-bot · 2015-10-24T06:00:59Z

Original comment by Pavel Roskin (BitBucket: pavel_roskin):

Cyclic import problem

:::text
[proski@dell pylintcycle]$ touch __init__.py
[proski@dell pylintcycle]$ echo 'import pylintcycle.second' >first.py
[proski@dell pylintcycle]$ echo 'import pylintcycle.first' >second.py
[proski@dell pylintcycle]$ pylint -r n --jobs=1 first.py second.py
************* Module pylintcycle.first
C:  1, 0: Missing module docstring (missing-docstring)
W:  1, 0: Unused import pylintcycle.second (unused-import)
************* Module pylintcycle.second
C:  1, 0: Missing module docstring (missing-docstring)
W:  1, 0: Unused import pylintcycle.first (unused-import)
R:  1, 0: Cyclic import (pylintcycle.first -> pylintcycle.second) (cyclic-import)
[proski@dell pylintcycle]$ pylint -r n --jobs=2 first.py second.py
************* Module pylintcycle.first
C:  1, 0: Missing module docstring (missing-docstring)
W:  1, 0: Unused import pylintcycle.second (unused-import)
************* Module pylintcycle.second
C:  1, 0: Missing module docstring (missing-docstring)
W:  1, 0: Unused import pylintcycle.first (unused-import)

pylint-bot · 2015-10-24T06:54:38Z

Original comment by Pavel Roskin (BitBucket: pavel_roskin):

When running pylint -rn --jobs=2 pylint in an empty directory, following issue is reported:

:::text
************* Module pylint.lint
E:978,15: Instance of 'Values' has no 'persistent' member (no-member)

The single-job version does not detect that condition.

pylint-bot · 2015-10-24T13:07:12Z

Original comment by Claudiu Popa (BitBucket: PCManticore, GitHub: @PCManticore):

Thank you for the detailed reports, Pavel. Will look soon.

pylint-bot · 2015-10-26T10:50:35Z

Original comment by Claudiu Popa (BitBucket: PCManticore, GitHub: @PCManticore):

Regarding pylint -rn --jobs=2 pylint, this happens because there's no configuration files which disables the corresponding messages for pylint, such as the one from pylint/pylintrc. I can reproduce it with both the single-job version and with multiple jobs, it's actually expected.

rdadolf · 2016-07-08T17:47:22Z

Late to the game and new to pylint, and I feel I'm running into this issue. I'm a little confused, though, since even very simple cases seem to break with -j2.

$ cat > lint_test.py <<EOF
def f(x):
 return x # 1 space
EOF

$ cat > pylintrc <<EOF
[MESSAGES CONTROL]
disable=all
enable=bad-indentation
EOF

$ pylint --version
pylint 1.6.1, 
astroid 1.4.7
Python 2.7.11 |Anaconda 2.3.0 (x86_64)| (default, Dec  6 2015, 18:57:58) 
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5577)]

$ pylint -rn lint_test.py 
************* Module lint_test
W:  2, 0: Bad indentation. Found 1 spaces, expected 4 (bad-indentation)

$ pylint -rn lint_test.py -j1
************* Module lint_test
W:  2, 0: Bad indentation. Found 1 spaces, expected 4 (bad-indentation)

$ pylint -rn lint_test.py -j2
<no output>

I don't see a way this can be expected behavior. Am I missing something? Am I using the tool fundamentally wrong?

PCManticore · 2016-07-08T19:12:40Z

Hi @rdadolf

This bug is definitely irritating, I don't remember exactly why it got stuck, I should check again if it works.

For me your example works perfectly. Do you have any pylintrc in that directory or somewhere else, which could potentially interfere with Pylint? I tried the same configuration, on Windows. Did you try on another OS? Does it work with multiple jobs and can you test with multiple files?

rdadolf · 2016-07-08T22:58:12Z

I sometimes forget that there are developers who use non-unix systems. It's possible that differences in process scheduling are at play here.

No other configuration files were in that directory, nor do I have a user-wide config file in my home directory.

The system above was OS X 10.11.3 running an Anaconda version of python (as shown in the --version output).

I just tried the same thing on an Ubuntu 15.10 machine which pylint was not previously installed. Used pip install pylint with no other actions, ran the same commands as above in a new scratch directory and I'm seeing the same behavior.

All values for N>1 with -jN seem to produce the same result (i.e., they fail to report anything).

Not sure what you mean by this last request, though:

Does it work with multiple jobs and can you test with multiple files?

The problem is identical for a multi-file module, if that's what you're asking. This setup:

$ ls -R
.:
lint_test  pylintrc

./lint_test:
__init__.py  lint_f.py  lint_g.py

$ cat lint_test/*.py
# __init__.py
from lint_f import f
from lint_g import g
# lint_f.py
def f(x):
 return x # 1 space
# lint_g.py
def g(x):
 return x # 1 space

I.e., a module with two source files and a simple __init__.py, also shows the same symptoms (same config file as before):

$ pylint -rn lint_test/
************* Module lint_test.lint_g
W:  3, 0: Bad indentation. Found 1 spaces, expected 4 (bad-indentation)
************* Module lint_test.lint_f
W:  3, 0: Bad indentation. Found 1 spaces, expected 4 (bad-indentation)
$ pylint -rn lint_test/ -j1
************* Module lint_test.lint_g
W:  3, 0: Bad indentation. Found 1 spaces, expected 4 (bad-indentation)
************* Module lint_test.lint_f
W:  3, 0: Bad indentation. Found 1 spaces, expected 4 (bad-indentation)
$ pylint -rn lint_test/ -j2
<no output>

Pierre-Sassoulas · 2022-07-01T11:43:45Z

Adding a reproducer from a duplicate issue:

Running pylint -jobs=0 does not report about cyclic-import. This can be reproduced with a trivial example.
a.py:

import b

b.py:

import a

mallniya · 2022-07-11T22:56:29Z

I'm sorry to unearth this, but duplicate-code is still not shown with -j 2 with

pylint 2.14.4
astroid 2.11.7
Python 3.10.5 (main, Jun  6 2022, 18:49:26) [GCC 12.1.0]

doublethefish · 2022-07-15T20:28:51Z

Which specific variant of duplicate code; in-file or across files?

mallniya · 2022-07-17T13:31:30Z

Only across files

doublethefish · 2022-08-04T08:48:20Z

Can you share an example of two files that fail? I'll add it to the tests (which I am assuming are still working and do test -j2-10 on similar files).

mallniya · 2022-08-04T13:31:34Z

I guess there is nothing special about such files -- any similar lines in 2 files really:

$ cat bin/1.py
1
2
3
4
5
6

same for bin/2.py.

$ pylint bin/1.py bin/2.py 
...
bin/2.py:1:0: R0801: Similar lines in 2 files
==1:[0:6]
==2:[0:6]
1
2
3
4
5
6 (duplicate-code)

seanbickle · 2022-09-12T09:17:21Z

I experience the same behaviour (Pylint 2.15.0, Python 3.8.13). This behaviour seems to affect any check for which context is spread across files (cyclical imports, duplicate code).

At first I thought this was because input files were checked across different parallel workers, and therefore important context from a secondary file (e.g. duplicate code) was outside the context of the parallel worker. I don't think this is the case though; even when files are processed on the same worker (but jobs>1), the same behaviour is observed.

I think this has more to do with the different ways in which files are handled between serial and parallel execution (determined by the number of jobs). For example, for files foo and bar, I observed the similarity linter running twice for each file in parallel, but once for all files in serial. Of course if the similarity linter lints only foo, it will miss code duplicated in bar.

Another example not yet mentioned is invalid-name. test1.py:

'''
Docstring
'''

class Test:
    '''
    Test Class
    '''

    CLASS_ATTR = 5

test2.py:

'''
Docstring
'''
from test1 import Test

x = Test()
x.CLASS_ATTR = 3

~ % pylint --jobs=0 test1.py test2.py

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 10.00/10 (previous run: 10.00/10, +0.00)

~ % pylint --jobs=1 test1.py test2.py
************* Module test2
test2.py:7:0: C0103: Attribute name "CLASS_ATTR" doesn't conform to snake_case naming style (invalid-name)

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 8.00/10 (previous run: 10.00/10, -2.00)

rpatterson · 2023-02-26T17:52:11Z

I just lost a ton of time trying to debug why I was getting different results on CI than I was in any other environment even though the same Docker images were used both locally and on CI. Finally I found out it was because I had jobs = 0 to auto-detect the number of CPUs/cores and the CI runner had only one CPU. When I set jobs = 1 I got the same results in all environments. And it wasn't just "cyclical imports, duplicate code" checks, other errors were reported only in CI as well.

At the very least, I think the Parallel execution docs should include a big red flashing light to warn other developers who might get bitten by this.

alexhayes · 2023-03-20T11:30:46Z

I just lost a ton of time trying to debug why I was getting different results on CI than I was in any other environment even though the same Docker images were used both locally and on CI. Finally I found out it was because I had jobs = 0 to auto-detect the number of CPUs/cores and the CI runner had only one CPU. When I set jobs = 1 I got the same results in all environments. And it wasn't just "cyclical imports, duplicate code" checks, other errors were reported only in CI as well.

At the very least, I think the Parallel execution docs should include a big red flashing light to warn other developers who might get bitten by this.

I've also been battling really odd behaviour in CI when everything was running fine locally (in docker or otherwise). Changing jobs to 0 was what fixed it to me however (for some reason I had it set to 8 🤷)

earonesty · 2023-03-23T17:11:31Z

it's easy to repro:

have a massive code base, with lots of files
run pylint in parallel
get spurious errors

pylint with 1 core (jobs==1) never has this issue, but is way too slow for large code bases

jacobtylerwalls · 2023-06-10T12:47:13Z

Thanks to all for the reproducers. Futuring the cyclic-import issue to #4171, and refocusing this issue on duplicate-code and closing it with #8757.

Some of the other comments in this thread are either no longer reproducible, or expected to be fixed by merged PRs:

📚 🚨 Please help us test the pylint and astroid alphas! 🚨 📚

If you can reproduce any further indeterminacy with --jobs on the main branches of pylint and astroid, please open a new issue with a minimal reproducer. Thanks!

jacobtylerwalls · 2023-06-30T16:28:47Z

And the cyclic-import issue should now be fixed by #8807.

pylint-bot added the Bug 🪲 label Dec 9, 2015

nedbat mentioned this issue Apr 14, 2021

Different results with -j4 and -j8 #4356

Closed

Pierre-Sassoulas added the High priority Issue with more than 10 reactions label Aug 6, 2021

skogsvik mentioned this issue Aug 19, 2021

Transform plugin not called when running with multiple jobs #4874

Closed

This was referenced Jul 1, 2022

inconsistent result in multiple runs #2573

Closed

Using --jobs affects monkey patching detection #502

Closed

Pierre-Sassoulas added the Needs PR This issue is accepted, sufficiently specified and now needs an implementation label Jul 5, 2022

Pierre-Sassoulas mentioned this issue Jul 5, 2022

Ordering of modules on command line affects reported errors #3611

Closed

jacobtylerwalls mentioned this issue Jul 6, 2022

Result of cyclic-import check [R0401] depends on execution speed #7137

Closed

Pierre-Sassoulas mentioned this issue Oct 28, 2022

Pylint does not report "unused-import" if there are quotes around type hint #7679

Closed

jacobtylerwalls added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Nov 13, 2022

Avasam mentioned this issue Mar 25, 2023

PLR0401 Cyclic import implementation astral-sh/ruff#2914

Open

jacobtylerwalls mentioned this issue Apr 26, 2023

duplicate-code is not detected when using more than one core #8259

Closed

This was referenced Jun 7, 2023

Pylint unreliable when parsing property.setter code #8752

Closed

Support duplicate-code message with --jobs #8757

Merged

jacobtylerwalls modified the milestones: 3.0.0, 3.0.0a7 Jun 10, 2023

jacobtylerwalls closed this as completed in #8757 Jun 10, 2023

Pierre-Sassoulas mentioned this issue Oct 2, 2023

Release branch 3.0.0 #9093

Merged

Different output with --jobs=1 and --jobs=2 #374

Different output with --jobs=1 and --jobs=2 #374

Comments

pylint-bot commented Nov 12, 2014

pylint-bot commented Nov 12, 2014

pylint-bot commented Nov 24, 2014

pylint-bot commented Dec 9, 2014

pylint-bot commented Dec 9, 2014

pylint-bot commented Dec 9, 2014

pylint-bot commented Dec 11, 2014

pylint-bot commented Dec 11, 2014

pylint-bot commented Jan 7, 2015

pylint-bot commented Jan 14, 2015

pylint-bot commented Jan 14, 2015

pylint-bot commented Jan 14, 2015

pylint-bot commented Jan 14, 2015

pylint-bot commented Jan 15, 2015

pylint-bot commented Jan 15, 2015

pylint-bot commented Jan 16, 2015

pylint-bot commented Feb 25, 2015

pylint-bot commented Feb 25, 2015

pylint-bot commented Sep 16, 2015

pylint-bot commented Sep 29, 2015

pylint-bot commented Oct 19, 2015

pylint-bot commented Oct 24, 2015

pylint-bot commented Oct 24, 2015

pylint-bot commented Oct 24, 2015

pylint-bot commented Oct 24, 2015

pylint-bot commented Oct 24, 2015

pylint-bot commented Oct 26, 2015

rdadolf commented Jul 8, 2016

PCManticore commented Jul 8, 2016

rdadolf commented Jul 8, 2016 • edited

Pierre-Sassoulas commented Jul 1, 2022

mallniya commented Jul 11, 2022

doublethefish commented Jul 15, 2022

mallniya commented Jul 17, 2022

doublethefish commented Aug 4, 2022

mallniya commented Aug 4, 2022 • edited

seanbickle commented Sep 12, 2022

rpatterson commented Feb 26, 2023

alexhayes commented Mar 20, 2023

earonesty commented Mar 23, 2023 • edited

jacobtylerwalls commented Jun 10, 2023

jacobtylerwalls commented Jun 30, 2023

rdadolf commented Jul 8, 2016 •

edited

mallniya commented Aug 4, 2022 •

edited

earonesty commented Mar 23, 2023 •

edited